Daniel Valent vs Tim VAN DER Horst Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Valent vs Horst analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Valent vs Tim VAN DER Horst Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Valent has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Horst has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Valent, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Horst has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Valent has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Horst has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Valent has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Horst winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Valent has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Horst has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Valent has played against opponents with an average rank of while Horst has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Valent has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Horst has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Valent has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Horst has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Valent 0 - 0 Horst
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Valent | Tim VAN DER Horst |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Daniel Valent Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Damien Wenger
Player
Daniel Valent
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Valent
Player
Rayane Oumaouche
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 4-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Valent
Player
Elia Joel Affolter
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
29%
(
10 of
34)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Valent
Player
Federico Iannaccone
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
Player
Daniel Valent
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Valent
Player
Giacomo Revelli
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Valent
Player
Leo Raquillet
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lilian Breut
Player
Daniel Valent
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Valent
Player
Raffael Schaer
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Tim VAN DER Horst Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Piotr Grynkowski
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Niklas Schell
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Ingo Herzgerodt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dominik Boehler
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Romain Gales
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more