Daniel Smethurst vs Mark Verryth Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smethurst vs Verryth analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Smethurst vs Mark Verryth Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smethurst has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Verryth has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smethurst, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Verryth has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smethurst has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Verryth has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smethurst has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Verryth winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smethurst has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 105/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 15/ 31). Verryth has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 59/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smethurst has played against opponents with an average rank of while Verryth has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smethurst has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Verryth has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smethurst has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Verryth has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smethurst 0 - 0 Verryth
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
Ret.
Rank
234
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
728
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
60% (299-199)
Career Total W/L
44% (74-94)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,660
Career Prize Money
$740
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Smethurst | Mark Verryth |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Smethurst Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
QF |
Marius Copil
Player
Daniel Smethurst
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
102)
24
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
57 of
78)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Joe Salisbury
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Ross Watson
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Adrien Bossel
Player
Daniel Smethurst
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Winston Lin
Player
Daniel Smethurst
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
81)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
12 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Keith-Patrick Crowley
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
15
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Daniel Smethurst
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Winston Lin
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Daniel Smethurst
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
7
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(1) 4-6 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Mark Verryth Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Mark Verryth
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Mark Verryth
Player
Dmitry Tursunov
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
20 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
19%
(
7 of
36)
40
Total Points Won
46
|
5-7 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Skander Mansouri
Player
Mark Verryth
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mark Verryth
Player
Andrew Carter
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cristian Rodriguez
Player
Mark Verryth
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Jesse Witten
Player
Mark Verryth
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
9
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mark Verryth
Player
Ruan Roelofse
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Mark Verryth
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
69 of
131)
8
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
15
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
53 of
131)
115
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H |
view more