Daniel Paty vs Lukas Rosol Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W L L
Form
L L W L W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Paty 1 - 0 Rosol
They have played 2 sets in total, with Paty winning 2 and Rosol winning 0. The last match between Paty and Rosol was at the M25 Bielsko Biala, 17-08-2023, Second, Clay with Daniel Paty getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Paty | 1 |
| Lukas Rosol | 0 |
M25 Bielsko Biala(17-08-2023)
7
6
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Collins PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Gauff VS Linette PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Daniel Paty
Player
Lukas Rosol
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
13
Games Won
10
14
Aces (Total)
6
1
Total Double Faults
6
1:54:0
Average Match Time
1:54:0
61% (48/79)
1st Serve %
52% (43/83)
79% (38/48)
1st Serve Win %
70% (30/43)
58% (18/31)
2nd Serve Win %
55% (22/40)
20% (1/5)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/10)
37% (31/83)
Return Points Win %
29% (23/79)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Popovic
Player
Daniel Paty
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Daniel Paty
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
112)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
59
|
6-0 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve %
67%
(
8 of
12)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
20
Total Points Won
10
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Marlon Vankan
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
10
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
0
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Daniel Paty
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Benjamin Saltman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Lukas Rosol Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Lukas Rosol
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
38
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Lukas Rosol
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
112)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Lukas Rosol
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Mirza Basic
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Yanaki Milev
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Lukas Rosol
52%
(
54 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
69 of
129)
5
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
11
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
38%
(
19 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
129)
118
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Patrik Homola
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Lukas Rosol
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Lukas Rosol
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
53% (129/114)
Win/Loss
55% (667/544)
52% (285/260)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (1545/1360)
52% (2808/2587)
Games Win/Loss
51% (14501/13925)
50% (8/8)
Hard Win/Loss
50% (136/137)
57% (114/87)
Clay Win/Loss
58% (330/240)
27% (7/19)
Indoor Hard W/L
56% (176/138)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
46% (25/29)
0.29
Aces Per Game
0.36
774
Aces Total
4980
0.14
Double Faults Per Game
0.2
369
Total Double Faults
2753
1st Match
Average Match Time
1st Match
317.29
Average Opponent Rank
542.51
60% (5227/8778)
1st Serve %
60% (39807/66550)
71% (3725/5227)
1st Serve Win %
72% (28712/39807)
49% (1753/3551)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (13336/26740)
41% (306/747)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (2143/5608)
38% (3252/8652)
Return Points Win %
37% (23878/65234)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
48% (49/54)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
37% (23/39)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
58% (14/10)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
50% (126/125)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/3)
Challenger W/L
56% (315/249)
54% (129/111)
Futures W/L
68% (140/66)
53% (128/242)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
55% (629/1138)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
45% (27/60)
41% (24/58)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
54% (273/509)
53% (32/60)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (227/405)
89% (130/116)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (633/543)
11% (130/14)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (633/89)
12% (113/13)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (578/121)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
