Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Nolan vs Aaron Leeder-Chard Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nolan vs Leeder-Chard analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Nolan vs Aaron Leeder-Chard Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nolan has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Leeder-Chard has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nolan, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Leeder-Chard has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nolan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leeder-Chard has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nolan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Leeder-Chard winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nolan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 64/ 60), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 9/ 19). Leeder-Chard has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nolan winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nolan winning 2 and Leeder-Chard winning 1. The last match between Nolan and Leeder-Chard was at the Australia F2, 24-02-2014, Q3, Hard with Daniel Nolan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nolan and Leeder-Chard have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nolan winning 1 times and Leeder-Chard 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nolan winning 1, and Leeder-Chard 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nolan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Leeder-Chard has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nolan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leeder-Chard has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nolan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leeder-Chard has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nolan 1 - 0 Leeder-Chard
Ret.
Rank
606
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
33
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
47% (74-82)
Career Total W/L
34% (23-45)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nolan VS Leeder-Chard H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Daniel Nolan | Aaron Leeder-Chard |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nolan VS Leeder-Chard H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 7-6(6) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Nolan | Aaron Leeder-Chard |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Nolan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Michael Look
Player
Daniel Nolan
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Nitin Kumar Sinha
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Mohit Mayur Jayaprakash
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Soichiro Moritani
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Look
Player
Daniel Nolan
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
55%
(
16 of
29)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
37
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maverick Banes
Player
Daniel Nolan
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
80%
(
32 of
40)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Alec Adamson
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Blake Ellis
65%
(
81 of
125)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
1
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
36%
(
16 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
103
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Calum Puttergill
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
11
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Takuto Niki
Player
Daniel Nolan
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Aaron Leeder-Chard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Nolan Vs Leeder-Chard Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
