Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava vs Jordi Samper-Montana Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nava vs Samper-Montana analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava vs Jordi Samper-Montana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Samper-Montana has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Samper-Montana winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 404/ 291), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 15/ 16). Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nava winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Samper-Montana winning 0. The last match between Nava and Samper-Montana was at the Scheveningen Challenger, 22-07-2015, Second, Clay with Daniel Munoz-De La Nava getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:5.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nava and Samper-Montana have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nava winning 0 times and Samper-Montana 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nava winning 0, and Samper-Montana 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of while Samper-Montana has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Samper-Montana has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Samper-Montana has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nava 1 - 0 Samper-Montana
Ret.
Rank
68
High
42
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
179
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
57% (521-389)
Career Total W/L
56% (442-346)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$282,573
Career Prize Money
$84,925
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nava VS Samper-Montana H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Daniel Munoz-De La Nava | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:5 | 1:28:5 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (43/63) | 54% (31/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (30/43) | 81% (25/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (21/57) | 33% (21/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Nava VS Samper-Montana H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Munoz-De La Nava | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Jan Choinski
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Sandro Ehrat
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
123)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Inigo Cervantes
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Nys
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
60%
(
32 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Nam Hoang Ly
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nava Vs Samper-Montana Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
