Daniel Michalski vs Sebastian Fanselow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Fanselow analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Sebastian Fanselow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 48.43% of points on his second serve, while Fanselow has won 51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 53.93% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fanselow has won 54.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.9% and 32.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 57.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fanselow has saved 61.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 40/ 25), with Fanselow winning 62.79% (W/L 54/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 174/ 90), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 204/ 116), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 30/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19), where as Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.56% of matches (W/L 34/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Michalski winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Michalski winning 2 and Fanselow winning 0. The last match between Michalski and Fanselow was at the M25 Santa Margherita di Pula, 06-05-2023, Final, Clay with Daniel Michalski getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Michalski and Fanselow have played a deciding set 0 times, with Michalski winning 0 times and Fanselow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Michalski winning 0, and Fanselow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 259.77 while Fanselow has played against players with an average rank of 240.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fanselow has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 40.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fanselow has converted 40.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Michalski 1 - 0 Fanselow
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
302
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
319
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
Form
62% (207-126)
Career Total W/L
61% (349-225)
44% (7-9)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Daniel Michalski | Sebastian Fanselow |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 2:10:0 | 2:10:0 |
1st Serve % | 54% (37/68) | 53% (41/78) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (24/37) | 51% (21/41) |
2nd Serve Win% | 61% (19/31) | 43% (16/37) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (5/20) | 0% (0/13) |
Return Points W% | 53% (41/78) | 37% (25/68) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Michalski | Sebastian Fanselow |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 44% (7/9) | 55% (12/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 54% (26/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (159/181) | 52% (247/231) |
Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 54% (7/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 56% (5/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.41 |
Aces Total | 19 | 97 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.25 |
DFs Total | 31 | 59 |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:46 | 1:44:45 |
Avg Opp Rank | 354.69 | 277.32 |
1st Serve % | 64% (738/1155) | 59% (890/1501) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (463/738) | 72% (640/890) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (201/417) | 51% (312/611) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (41/98) | 37% (55/149) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (417/1090) | 38% (595/1552) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 53% (9/8) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (7/16) | 52% (11/21) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 45% (5/11) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 92% (12/11) |
1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 8% (12/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 10% (10/1) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dominic Thiem
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Jonas Forejtek
54%
(
66 of
122)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
63%
(
35 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
42 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
122)
121
Total Points Won
123
|
7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Daniel Michalski
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
49 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
13
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
7
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(0) 0-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Tomas Curras Abasolo
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Federico Iannaccone
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
George Loffhagen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yurii Dzhavakian
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Duje Ajdukovic
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
62%
(
71 of
115)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
107)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
34%
(
39 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
107)
118
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Enrico Dalla Valle
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
4
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
37 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Jonas Forejtek
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H |
view more