Daniel Michalski vs Martin Cuevas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Cuevas analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Martin Cuevas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 48.43% of points on his second serve, while Cuevas has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 53.93% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cuevas has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.9% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 57.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cuevas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 40/ 25), with Cuevas winning 33.33% (W/L 2/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 174/ 90), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Cuevas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 390/ 285), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19), where as Cuevas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Michalski winning 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Michalski winning 3 and Cuevas winning 5. The last match between Michalski and Cuevas was at the M25 Antalya, 27-02-2022, Semifinals, Clay with Martin Cuevas getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Michalski and Cuevas have played a deciding set 2 times, with Michalski winning 1 times and Cuevas 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Michalski winning 0, and Cuevas 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 259.77 while Cuevas has played against players with an average rank of 65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cuevas has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 40.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cuevas has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Michalski 1 - 2 Cuevas
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
302
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
1
Hard0
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
838
Rank
271
High
32
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
Form
62% (207-126)
Career Total W/L
57% (401-301)
44% (7-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Daniel Michalski | Martin Cuevas |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
Sets Won | 3 | 5 |
Games Won | 34 | 41 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 23 |
DFs (Total) | 8 | 12 |
Avg Match Time | 2:6:0 | 2:6:0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (166/246) | 60% (150/249) |
1st Serve Win% | 58% (97/166) | 69% (104/150) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (40/80) | 46% (46/99) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (10/24) | 52% (13/25) |
Return Points W% | 40% (99/249) | 44% (109/246) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-4 |
Martin Cuevas
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
6-4 2-6 6-4 |
Martin Cuevas
Player
Daniel Michalski
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
2-6 7-5 6-4 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Martin Cuevas
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
3
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Michalski | Martin Cuevas |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 20% (1/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (159/181) | 42% (26/36) |
Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.11 | 0 |
Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
DFs Total | 31 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:46 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 354.69 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (738/1155) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (463/738) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (201/417) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (41/98) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (417/1090) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (7/16) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dominic Thiem
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Jonas Forejtek
54%
(
66 of
122)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
63%
(
35 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
42 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
122)
121
Total Points Won
123
|
7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Daniel Michalski
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
49 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Martin Cuevas Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(5) 7-5 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Martin Cuevas
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Cuevas
Player
Vicente Oliver Moratalla
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Cuevas
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
51%
(
58 of
114)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
3
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
3
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
41%
(
23 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
53 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Martin Cuevas
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Ignacio Galarza
Player
Martin Cuevas
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Cuevas
Player
Tristan Boyer
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
109)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lorenzo Bocchi
Player
Martin Cuevas
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
39%
(
22 of
57)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
18 of
22)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Martin Cuevas
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more