Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Michalski vs Kuan-Yi Lee Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Lee analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Kuan-Yi Lee Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.5% of points on his second serve, while Lee has won 44.9%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 52.53% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lee has won 55.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.29% and 41.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 57.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lee has saved 47.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 57.81% of matches played (W/L 37/ 27), with Lee winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 180/ 93), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Lee has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 43/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 15/ 20), where as Lee has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 12/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Michalski winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Michalski winning 0 and Lee winning 2. The last match between Michalski and Lee was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 05-03-2019, First, Hard with Kuan-Yi Lee getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Michalski and Lee have played a deciding set 0 times, with Michalski winning 0 times and Lee 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Michalski winning 0, and Lee 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.75 while Lee has played against players with an average rank of 60.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lee has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 44.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lee has converted 37.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Michalski 0 - 1 Lee
335
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
857
Rank
447
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
62% (213-129)
Career Total W/L
60% (181-121)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
67% (2-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Kuan-Yi Lee |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 0 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:58:0 | 0:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (30/45) | 69% (22/32) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 37% (11/30) | 77% (17/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 27% (4/15) | 70% (7/10) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 25% (8/32) | 67% (30/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats 
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Kuan-Yi Lee |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 67% (2/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (29/27) | 67% (4/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (268/272) | 53% (31/27) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:48 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 317.72 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1104/1793) | 71% (119/168) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (700/1104) | 61% (73/119) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (355/689) | 45% (22/49) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (74/164) | 38% (12/32) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (713/1752) | 46% (91/198) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (5/2) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (13/25) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Branko Djuric
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kuan-Yi Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Marlon Vankan
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Niccolo Catini
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yamato Sueoka
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
11 of
21)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
17 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
35
Total Points Won
33
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matyas Fuele
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
66 of
87)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Nan Hsun Lin
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksander Chayka
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
52%
(
59 of
114)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
12
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
18
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
40%
(
22 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
47%
(
54 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sheng Tang
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
10
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
5-7 6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linang Xiao
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michalski Vs Lee Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
