Daniel Michalski vs Kalin Ivanovski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W L
Form
L W W W W W W W L LHead-2-Head: Michalski 1 - 0 Ivanovski
They have played 3 sets in total, with Michalski winning 2 and Ivanovski winning 1. The last match between Michalski and Ivanovski was at the Zadar Challenger, 16-03-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Daniel Michalski getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Michalski | 1 |
| Kalin Ivanovski | 0 |
Zadar Challenger(16-03-2025)
6
4
4
6
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Moller VS Basavareddy PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
21 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Michalski
Player
Kalin Ivanovski
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:13:14 | Average Match Time | 2:13:14 |
| 68% (63/93) | 1st Serve % | 73% (53/73) |
| 65% (41/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (31/53) |
| 57% (17/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 44% (32/73) | Return Points Win % | 38% (35/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Moise Kouame
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Alexey Vatutin
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
84%
(
88 of
105)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(6) 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
83%
(
19 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Jakub Nicod
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
37
Total Points Won
35
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Stijn Slump
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Eero Vasa
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
91 of
134)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
55 of
91)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
60 of
134)
120
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kalin Ivanovski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Kalin Ivanovski
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Michael Vrbensky
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
49
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Zdenek Kolar
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
64%
(
76 of
118)
1st Serve %
81%
(
95 of
118)
9
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
69 of
95)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
38 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
118)
119
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Kane Bonsach Ganley
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(1) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Kalin Ivanovski
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (261/152) | Win/Loss | 55% (96/77) |
| 61% (575/372) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (213/188) |
| 54% (4668/3937) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1993/1890) |
| 48% (30/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (44/27) |
| 66% (226/114) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (38/36) |
| 45% (5/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (14/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 575 | Aces Total | 663 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 833 | Total Double Faults | 441 |
| 1:49:27 | Average Match Time | 1:39:33 |
| 500.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 438.99 |
| 62% (16739/27165) | 1st Serve % | 60% (6720/11188) |
| 64% (10792/16739) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (4666/6720) |
| 51% (5356/10426) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2122/4468) |
| 48% (1581/3324) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (470/1128) |
| 44% (12233/27516) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4560/11358) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (68/69) | Challenger W/L | 38% (15/25) |
| 71% (192/78) | Futures W/L | 61% (81/52) |
| 63% (257/406) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (94/169) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (56/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (33/67) |
| 55% (71/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (36/59) |
| 87% (257/223) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (83/70) |
| 13% (257/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (83/13) |
| 24% (156/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (90/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
