Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Michalski vs Kacper Zuk Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Zuk analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Kacper Zuk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.25% of points on his second serve, while Zuk has won 56.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 52.9% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zuk has won 48.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.73% and 19.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 56.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zuk has saved 63.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 58.06% of matches played (W/L 36/ 26), with Zuk winning 41.67% (W/L 15/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 179/ 92), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Zuk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 87/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19), where as Zuk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Michalski winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Michalski winning 2 and Zuk winning 0. The last match between Michalski and Zuk was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 12-04-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Daniel Michalski getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Michalski and Zuk have played a deciding set 0 times, with Michalski winning 0 times and Zuk 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Michalski winning 0, and Zuk 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.11 while Zuk has played against players with an average rank of 239.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zuk has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 44.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zuk has converted 30.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Michalski 1 - 0 Zuk
318
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
631
Rank
162
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
62% (212-128)
Career Total W/L
59% (226-155)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$75,150
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Kacper Zuk |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (39/55) | 69% (45/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (29/39) | 58% (26/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 35% (7/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (32/65) | 31% (17/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Michalski
Player
Kacper Zuk
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Kacper Zuk |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (27/25) | 30% (3/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (250/252) | 47% (48/55) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:53 | 1:36:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 322.96 | 263.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1048/1680) | 70% (222/318) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (661/1048) | 66% (146/222) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (322/632) | 57% (55/96) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (70/149) | 38% (8/21) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (654/1605) | 30% (87/292) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kacper Zuk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Kacper Zuk
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Kacper Zuk
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
16
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Viktor Frydrych
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Kacper Zuk
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Kacper Zuk
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
108)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Kacper Zuk
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Kacper Zuk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
13
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
97%
(
38 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
8 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Adrian Andreev
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(12) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Jiri Vesely
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
10
Aces
17
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
63%
(
29 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Petr Nouza
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
8
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michalski Vs Zuk Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
