Daniel Michalski vs Deney Wassermann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Wassermann analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Deney Wassermann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.2% of points on his second serve, while Wassermann has won 51.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 53.34% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wassermann has won 49.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.68% and 33.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 56.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wassermann has saved 62.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 58.06% of matches played (W/L 36/ 26), with Wassermann winning 53.49% (W/L 23/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 179/ 92), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 68/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19), where as Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Michalski winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Michalski winning 2 and Wassermann winning 1. The last match between Michalski and Wassermann was at the M15 Antalya, 26-03-2021, Second, Clay with Daniel Michalski getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Michalski and Wassermann have played a deciding set 1 times, with Michalski winning 1 times and Wassermann 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Michalski winning 0, and Wassermann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.11 while Wassermann has played against players with an average rank of 180.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wassermann has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 46.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wassermann has converted 32.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Michalski 1 - 0 Wassermann
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
318
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
715
Rank
696
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
62% (212-128)
Career Total W/L
59% (99-70)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
50% (6-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Michalski VS Wassermann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Daniel Michalski | Deney Wassermann |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 14 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 2:46:0 | 2:46:0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (66/93) | 63% (66/105) |
1st Serve Win% | 59% (39/66) | 59% (39/66) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (13/27) | 44% (17/39) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 28% (5/18) | 33% (4/12) |
Return Points W% | 47% (49/105) | 44% (41/93) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Michalski VS Wassermann H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 2-6 6-3 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Deney Wassermann
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Michalski | Deney Wassermann |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 50% (6/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 52% (27/25) | 52% (13/12) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (250/252) | 52% (117/106) |
Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 57% (4/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 50% (2/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.39 |
Aces Total | 33 | 42 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.41 |
DFs Total | 46 | 44 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:53 | 1:37:30 |
Avg Opp Rank | 322.96 | 133.25 |
1st Serve % | 62% (1048/1680) | 54% (389/721) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (661/1048) | 73% (285/389) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (322/632) | 52% (173/332) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (70/149) | 28% (25/88) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (654/1605) | 39% (296/762) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 71% (5/2) | 50% (6/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 67% (6/9) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 100% (4/4) |
1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (4/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Deney Wassermann Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
47%
(
7 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
18
Total Points Won
10
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Deney Wassermann
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ignacio Buse
Player
Deney Wassermann
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Nikolay Nedelchev
Player
Deney Wassermann
78%
(
77 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Imanol Lopez Morillo
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
76%
(
26 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
95)
6
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more