Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Michalski vs David Pichler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Pichler analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs David Pichler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.2% of points on his second serve, while Pichler has won 50.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 53.34% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pichler has won 53.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.68% and 31.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 56.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pichler has saved 56.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 58.06% of matches played (W/L 36/ 26), with Pichler winning 45.9% (W/L 28/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 179/ 92), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19), where as Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 20/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Michalski winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Michalski winning 2 and Pichler winning 2. The last match between Michalski and Pichler was at the Manama Challenger, 12-02-2024, Q1 round, Hard with David Pichler getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:34.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Michalski and Pichler have played a deciding set 0 times, with Michalski winning 0 times and Pichler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Michalski winning 0, and Pichler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.11 while Pichler has played against players with an average rank of 205.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pichler has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 46.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pichler has converted 45.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Michalski 1 - 1 Pichler
318
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
574
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
62% (212-128)
Career Total W/L
56% (340-264)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
44% (7-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Michalski | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 14 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:34 | 1:27:34 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (77/112) | 65% (65/100) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (42/77) | 65% (42/65) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 34% (12/35) | 49% (17/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 50% (9/18) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (41/100) | 52% (58/112) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
David Pichler
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Michalski | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 44% (7/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (27/25) | 50% (19/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (250/252) | 50% (175/172) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 53 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:53 | 1:45:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 322.96 | 300.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1048/1680) | 63% (673/1070) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (661/1048) | 69% (462/673) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (322/632) | 49% (196/397) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (70/149) | 45% (46/103) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (654/1605) | 40% (442/1112) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (5/2) | 57% (4/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 47% (7/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
David Pichler
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Akram El Sallaly
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
David Pichler
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
David Pichler
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Michalski Vs Pichler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
