Daniel Michalski vs Corentin Denolly Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W L L W W L W L
Form
W L L L L W L L W LH2H: Michalski 2 - 2 Denolly
They have played 9 sets in total, with Michalski winning 5 and Denolly winning 4. The last match between Michalski and Denolly was at the Skopje Challenger, 21-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Daniel Michalski getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Daniel Michalski | 2 |
Corentin Denolly | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Skopje Challenger(21-05-2025)
Michalski | Stats | Denolly |
---|---|---|
64% (28-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (12-18) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
301 | Ranking | 297 |
243 | Highest Rank | 269 |
25 | Age | 28 |
R | Plays | L |
14 | Titles | 12 |
63% (267-159) | Career Total W/L | 62% (414-250) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $56,935 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
2 | Clay H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Opelka VS Rinderknech PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
Blinkova VS Tauson PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay Open - Nottingham wta
19 Jun 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Michalski
Player
Corentin Denolly
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
6-0 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Michalski
Player
Corentin Denolly
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Corentin Denolly
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
50 of
99)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
6-0 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Corentin Denolly
Player
Daniel Michalski
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
5 | Sets Won | 4 |
41 | Games Won | 34 |
7 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:35:31 | Average Match Time | 1:35:31 |
58% (147/254) | 1st Serve % | 65% (157/241) |
64% (94/147) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (95/157) |
48% (51/107) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (36/84) |
49% (17/35) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (12/33) |
46% (110/241) | Return Points Win % | 43% (109/254) |
50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Michalski vs Denolly Match Preview :
- Recent second serve performance shows Denolly with 44.15% of points won and Michalski slightly ahead with 45.65%.
- Denolly excels at returning second serves, winning 47.79% of points compared to Michalski’s 44.77%.
- On first serve returns, Michalski shows superior form, winning 31.63% of points against Denolly’s 26.55%.
- How do they perform under pressure? Denolly saves 51.61% of breakpoints, whereas Michalski saves 48.91%.
- Michalski has won a higher percentage of matches over the past year at 67.12% compared to Denolly’s 61.11%.
- Both players excel on clay, each with a career win rate of 66% on this surface.
- On indoor hard courts, Michalski struggles more with a 45% win rate versus Denolly's 55%.
- In their recent competitions, Denolly and Michalski have shown strong performance at the $10K level, winning 79.41% and 77.78% respectively.
- In head-to-head matchups, Denolly leads with two wins to Michalski's one out of three encounters.
- Denolly has an edge in deciding sets, winning 75% of them compared to Michalski’s 65%.
- Looking at extreme pressure situations, Denolly is stronger, winning their only tiebreak against Michalski.
- Overall, Denolly competes against stronger opponents, with an average opponent rank of 313.79 versus Michalski's 417.48.
- Denolly is less efficient in break point conversion, with a rate of 30.92%, while Michalski boasts a higher rate at 36.23%.
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Denolly and Michalski shows two players with strong clay court records, promising an interesting battle. Denolly’s ability to win key second serve return points and outperform in pressure situations like tiebreaks gives him a distinct edge.
Michalski, however, has proven to be more effective at converting break points and has enjoyed a slightly better Win-Loss record over the past year. Despite this, his performance against opponents of lower average rank may skew his statistics slightly.
Considering Denolly's superior record in deciding sets and previous head-to-head encounters, he appears to have a slight edge. The combination of returning capabilities and mental fortitude in high-pressure situations positions Denolly as the likely victor in their upcoming match.
Michalski vs Denolly Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Daniel Michalski
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Michalski
Player
Tomasz Berkieta
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
9
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Henrique Rocha
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Michalski
Player
Stefan Latinovic
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Michalski
Player
Tomas Lanik
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Michalski
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Hugo Dellien
Player
Daniel Michalski
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Michalski
Player
Corentin Denolly
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Damien Wenger
Player
Corentin Denolly
60%
(
67 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
110)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
110)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(2) 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Corentin Denolly
Player
Tanguy Genier
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
46
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Mark Lajal
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Michalski
Player
Corentin Denolly
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Corentin Denolly
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Corentin Denolly
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Corentin Denolly
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Corentin Denolly
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
63% (267/159) | Win/Loss | 62% (414/250) |
60% (587/387) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (905/609) |
54% (4778/4060) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7593/6530) |
48% (30/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (61/48) |
66% (232/121) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (295/154) |
45% (5/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (58/47) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
594 | Aces Total | 2011 |
0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
856 | Total Double Faults | 1914 |
1:48:57 | Average Match Time | 1:26:57 |
502.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 497.55 |
62% (17185/27899) | 1st Serve % | 65% (26750/41136) |
64% (11074/17185) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (18002/26750) |
51% (5490/10714) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7004/14387) |
47% (1613/3401) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2095/4646) |
44% (12544/28271) | Return Points Win % | 43% (17746/41724) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 40% (2/3) |
50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/4) | Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) |
49% (74/76) | Challenger W/L | 43% (53/69) |
71% (192/78) | Futures W/L | 67% (356/176) |
63% (263/418) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (411/655) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
67% (59/88) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (103/182) |
56% (73/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (114/193) |
87% (263/229) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (400/360) |
13% (263/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (400/40) |
23% (163/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (264/54) |
Michalski vs. Denolly Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions
- Loading news...