S. R. Taverna
To Win
D. Michalski
To Win
Daniel Masur vs Daniel Michalski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W L W L
Form
L L W W L W L L W WHead-To-Head: Masur 1 - 0 Michalski
They have played 2 sets in total, with Masur winning 2 and Michalski winning 0. The last match between Masur and Michalski was at the Heilbronn Challenger, 01-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Daniel Masur getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Masur | 1 |
| Daniel Michalski | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Heilbronn Challenger(01-06-2025)
Daniel Masur
Daniel Michalski
6
2
6
2
| Masur | Stats | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| 32% (8-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (30-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 475 | Ranking | 297 |
| 176 | Highest Rank | 243 |
| 30 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 14 |
| 57% (408-313) | Career Total W/L | 63% (269-160) |
| $156,200 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
08 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Swiatek VS Samsonova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Siegemund PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Michalski
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:12:26 | Average Match Time | 1:12:26 |
| 60% (27/45) | 1st Serve % | 65% (34/52) |
| 93% (25/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (21/34) |
| 50% (9/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (3/18) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 54% (28/52) | Return Points Win % | 24% (11/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Masur vs Michalski Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: In the last 6 months, Michalski has a 45.5% success rate on second serves, slightly behind Masur's 45.76%. This metric has been highly linked with match outcome predictions. Does this give Masur an edge? Perhaps slightly.
- Return Game Stats: Michalski wins 44.64% of opponents' second serve points, while Masur excels with a 48.05% win rate. However, Michalski has the upper hand on first serve returns, securing 31.39% compared to Masur's 24.2%. Which factor will dominate in this contest?
- Breakpoint Resilience: Under pressure, Michalski saves 49.27% of breakpoints, whereas Masur is marginally better at 52.45%. Does this suggest Masur thrives better in clutch moments?
- Overall Match Performance: Over the past year, Michalski has a commanding win rate of 67.12% (W/L 49/24) compared to Masur's 39.22% (W/L 20/31), suggesting a stronger overall form for Michalski.
- Surface Preference: Michalski performs best on Clay, with a dominant win rate of 66%, but struggles on indoor hard courts (45%). Masur favors Hard surfaces with a 56% win rate but finds difficulty on Grass (41%).
- Player Level Experience: Michalski typically plays on lower-tier Futures/ITF $10K events, winning 77.78% of matches, while Masur competes at higher Challenger levels, although with a 38.71% win rate. How does the level of competition affect predictions?
- Opponent Quality: Michalski has faced opponents averaging a rank of 414.45, whereas Masur's opponents are typically stronger with an average rank of 369. Does this indicate Masur's experience against stronger players could be beneficial?
- Deciding Set Records: Michalski shines in close matches, winning 68% of deciding sets in the last year, compared to Masur’s 38%. In a tight match, Michalski seems more likely to thrive.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Michalski converts 35.21% of breakpoint chances, marginally higher than Masur's 33.33%, a small, yet noteworthy advantage in pivotal moments.
Editorial Prediction (May 31, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the various performance metrics, Michalski appears to have a slight edge in several key areas. Despite marginally lower recent second serve statistics, his proficiency in converting breakpoints and excelling in deciding sets cannot be overlooked.
Masur’s slight advantage in facing stronger opponents and saving breakpoints might give him leverage, yet his lower overall match win percentage over the past year suggests potential vulnerability.
Considering Michalski's strong form over the last year and his proven ability under pressure, he seems likely to come out on top in this match.
Masur vs Michalski Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Daniel Masur
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Yannik Kelm
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Daniel Masur
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
10
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Michalski
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Daniel Masur
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
74 of
124)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
124)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Federico Bondioli
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Alessandro Pecci
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Francesco Forti
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Daniel Michalski
49%
(
40 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Daniel Michalski
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Tomasz Berkieta
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
9
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Stefan Latinovic
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Tomas Lanik
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (408/313) | Win/Loss | 63% (269/160) |
| 55% (941/759) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (592/389) |
| 52% (8555/7813) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4818/4088) |
| 56% (87/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (30/32) |
| 55% (150/121) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (234/122) |
| 60% (162/110) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) |
| 41% (9/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 2983 | Aces Total | 600 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1902 | Total Double Faults | 867 |
| 1:19:48 | Average Match Time | 1:49:2 |
| 516.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 504.55 |
| 64% (27279/42676) | 1st Serve % | 62% (17289/28104) |
| 71% (19414/27279) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (11151/17289) |
| 49% (7547/15397) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5547/10815) |
| 41% (1654/4014) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1625/3424) |
| 39% (16544/42871) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12638/28486) |
| 43% (10/13) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 29% (12/30) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 52% (193/178) | Challenger W/L | 50% (76/77) |
| 68% (192/90) | Futures W/L | 71% (192/78) |
| 56% (398/707) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (265/421) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (123/259) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (60/90) |
| 50% (129/260) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (73/131) |
| 81% (416/337) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (265/231) |
| 19% (416/78) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (265/33) |
| 22% (304/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (164/37) |
Masur vs. Michalski Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
