Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Little vs Martim LEOTE Prata Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Little vs Prata analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Little vs Martim LEOTE Prata Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Little has won 44.32% of points on his second serve, while Prata has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Little, in recent form, has won 47.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Prata has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 18.52% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Little has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Prata has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Little has won 44% of matches played (W/L 11/ 14), with Prata winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7). Prata has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 13), where as Prata has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Little has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.16 while Prata has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Little has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Prata has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Little has converted 60% of breakpoint opportunities, and Prata has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Little 0 - 0 Prata
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Little | Martim LEOTE Prata |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (28/36) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 11 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (120/208) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (91/120) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (39/88) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 60% (3/5) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 31% (61/194) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 1st Match |
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Lorenzo Lorusso
Player
Daniel Little
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Daniel Little
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Thomas Deschamps
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
20
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Theo Papamalamis
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
52%
(
64 of
123)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
123)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Daniel Little
84%
(
72 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Weightman
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luc Koenig
Player
Daniel Little
66%
(
81 of
123)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
127)
7
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
60 of
80)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
45 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
127)
125
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Oscar Weightman
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
12
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Martim LEOTE Prata Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-7(5) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Martim Leote Prata
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianni Ross
Player
Martim Leote Prata
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Martim Leote Prata
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martim Leote Prata
Player
Duarte Vale
59%
(
77 of
130)
1st Serve %
54%
(
65 of
120)
7
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
11
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
50 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
133
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Little Vs Prata Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
