Daniel Glancy vs Thomas SCHWENCKE Lindqvist Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Glancy vs Lindqvist analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Glancy vs Thomas SCHWENCKE Lindqvist Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Glancy has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lindqvist has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Glancy, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lindqvist has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Glancy has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lindqvist has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Glancy has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lindqvist winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Glancy has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 49/ 56), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 37/ 59). Lindqvist has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Glancy has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lindqvist has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Glancy has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lindqvist has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Glancy has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lindqvist has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Glancy 0 - 0 Lindqvist
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Glancy | Thomas SCHWENCKE Lindqvist |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Daniel Glancy Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Remi Boutillier
Player
Daniel Glancy
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Glancy
Player
Ben Jones
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 3-6 6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Filip Peliwo
Player
Daniel Glancy
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Robert Carter
Player
Daniel Glancy
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Thomas SCHWENCKE Lindqvist Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Miguel Fernando Pereira
Player
Thomas Schwencke Lindqvist
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more