Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Ivan Gakhov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gimeno-Traver vs Gakhov analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Ivan Gakhov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gakhov has won 46.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gimeno-Traver, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gakhov has won 49.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gakhov has saved 65.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gakhov winning 39.22% (W/L 20/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22). Gakhov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 402/ 230), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gimeno-Traver winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Gimeno-Traver winning 4 and Gakhov winning 2. The last match between Gimeno-Traver and Gakhov was at the Spain F5 (Murcia), 16-02-2018, Quarterfinals, Clay with Daniel Gimeno-Traver getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gimeno-Traver and Gakhov have played a deciding set 2 times, with Gimeno-Traver winning 2 times and Gakhov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Gimeno-Traver winning 1, and Gakhov 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gimeno-Traver has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gakhov has played against players with an average rank of 272.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gakhov has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gakhov has converted 43.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gimeno-Traver 2 - 0 Gakhov
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
272
Rank
142
High
27
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
57% (625-479)
Career Total W/L
61% (464-295)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
38% (8-13)
$1,102,200
Career Prize Money
$56,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gimeno-Traver VS Gakhov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Ivan Gakhov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 34 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:25:0 | 2:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (146/199) | 63% (125/199) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (97/146) | 70% (87/125) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (29/53) | 54% (40/74) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 26% (5/19) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (72/199) | 37% (73/199) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Gimeno-Traver VS Gakhov H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Ivan Gakhov
77%
(
73 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
24 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-7(0) 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Ivan Gakhov
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Ivan Gakhov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (8/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (21/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (231/239) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 41% (7/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 100 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 76 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:49:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 252.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (931/1578) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (652/931) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (300/647) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (54/123) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (566/1501) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (6/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (8/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (11/0) |
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ivan Gakhov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Henri Squire
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alexander Weis
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Ivan Gakhov
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Ivan Gakhov
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gimeno-Traver Vs Gakhov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ivan Gakhov
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
