Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Daniil Medvedev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gimeno-Traver vs Medvedev analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Daniil Medvedev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Medvedev has won 49.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gimeno-Traver, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Medvedev has won 54.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Medvedev has saved 63.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Medvedev winning 73.97% (W/L 54/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22). Medvedev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 237/ 74), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 78/ 44).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gimeno-Traver winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gimeno-Traver winning 2 and Medvedev winning 3. The last match between Gimeno-Traver and Medvedev was at the Bet-at-home Open - Hamburg, 14-07-2016, Second, Clay with Daniel Gimeno-Traver getting the victory 1100037788.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gimeno-Traver and Medvedev have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gimeno-Traver winning 1 times and Medvedev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Gimeno-Traver winning 2, and Medvedev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gimeno-Traver has played against opponents with an average rank of while Medvedev has played against players with an average rank of 92.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Medvedev has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Medvedev has converted 41.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gimeno-Traver 1 - 1 Medvedev
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
4
Rank
1
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
57% (625-479)
Career Total W/L
72% (508-202)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
79% (19-5)
$1,102,200
Career Prize Money
$28,877,260
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gimeno-Traver VS Medvedev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Daniil Medvedev |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 25 | 31 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:10:43 | 2:10:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (132/207) | 55% (107/194) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (78/132) | 68% (73/107) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (45/75) | 59% (51/87) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 16% (3/19) | 28% (7/25) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (70/194) | 41% (84/207) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Gimeno-Traver VS Medvedev H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-6(4) 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Daniil Medvedev
65%
(
97 of
149)
1st Serve %
52%
(
67 of
128)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
60%
(
31 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
40%
(
60 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
128)
137
Total Points Won
140
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Daniil Medvedev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (19/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (46/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (362/299) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 82% (18/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.46 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 149 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 107 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:11:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 93.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (1286/2094) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (929/1286) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (402/808) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (98/225) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (866/2141) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (13/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/7) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/5) |
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniil Medvedev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Daniil Medvedev
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Gael Monfils
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Daniil Medvedev
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Nicolas Jarry
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Dominik Koepfer
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Cameron Norrie
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Marton Fucsovics
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Daniil Medvedev
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Tommy Paul
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Holger Rune
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gimeno-Traver Vs Medvedev Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
