Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Andreas Haider-Maurer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gimeno-Traver vs Haider-Maurer analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Andreas Haider-Maurer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Haider-Maurer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gimeno-Traver, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Haider-Maurer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Haider-Maurer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Haider-Maurer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22). Haider-Maurer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 325/ 199), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gimeno-Traver winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Gimeno-Traver winning 0 and Haider-Maurer winning 4. The last match between Gimeno-Traver and Haider-Maurer was at the Sibiu Challenger, 16-09-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Andreas Haider-Maurer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gimeno-Traver and Haider-Maurer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gimeno-Traver winning 0 times and Haider-Maurer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gimeno-Traver winning 0, and Haider-Maurer 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gimeno-Traver has played against opponents with an average rank of while Haider-Maurer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Haider-Maurer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Haider-Maurer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gimeno-Traver 0 - 2 Haider-Maurer
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
47
High
37
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
57% (625-479)
Career Total W/L
57% (447-336)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,102,200
Career Prize Money
$723,565
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gimeno-Traver VS Haider-Maurer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Andreas Haider-Maurer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 19 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 16 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:13 | 1:49:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (103/168) | 55% (95/173) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (62/103) | 73% (69/95) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (33/65) | 49% (38/78) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 21% (4/19) | 33% (7/21) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (66/173) | 43% (73/168) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Gimeno-Traver VS Haider-Maurer H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 7-5 7-6(2) |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
48%
(
47 of
98)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Andreas Haider-Maurer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Andreas Haider-Maurer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Mikhail Balmashev
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alen Avidzba
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
34 of
39)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
49%
(
17 of
35)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
4
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
42%
(
35 of
84)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
10
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
4
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
54 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
121)
130
Total Points Won
121
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Gimeno-Traver Vs Haider-Maurer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
