D. Evans
To Win
B. Nakashima
To Win
Daniel Evans vs Clement Tabur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W W W L W
Form
W W W W L W W W L LHead-2-Head: Evans 0 - 1 Tabur
They have played 2 sets in total, with Evans winning 0 and Tabur winning 2. The last match between Evans and Tabur was at the French Open - Paris, 22-05-2025, Round: Q2 round, Surface: Clay, with Clement Tabur getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Evans | 0 |
| Clement Tabur | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(22-05-2025)
Clement Tabur
Daniel Evans
6
1
6
3
| Evans | Stats | Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (13-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (37-13) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 199 | Ranking | 217 |
| 21 | Highest Rank | 202 |
| 35 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 24 | Titles | 11 |
| 59% (580-402) | Career Total W/L | 61% (292-190) |
| $5,047,980 | Career Prize Money | $78,000 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Halys VS Medvedev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shapovalov VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Clement Tabur
Player
Daniel Evans
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 4 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:8:0 | Average Match Time | 1:8:0 |
| 59% (30/51) | 1st Serve % | 62% (26/42) |
| 67% (20/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 88% (23/26) |
| 33% (7/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (10/16) |
| 0% (0/1) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 80% (4/5) |
| 21% (9/42) | Return Points Win % | 47% (24/51) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Evans vs Tabur Match Preview :
- Evans has a marginal edge in second serve performance, winning 44.62% of points compared to Tabur's 43.76% over the past six months. Will this advantage influence the match outcome?
- Return game stats indicate Tabur is slightly better in returning both first and second serves. How might this impact the match? Evans has a 28.36% success rate on first serve returns, while Tabur boasts 30.08%.
- Under pressure, Tabur appears more resilient, saving 55.64% of breakpoints compared to Evans' 50%. This factor could be crucial during key moments.
- In their performance overview for the past year, Tabur’s winning percentage is higher at 61.33% versus Evans’ 45.83%. Does this make Tabur the favorite?
- Evans performs best on indoor hard courts with a career win rate of 62%, whereas Tabur excels on hard courts, winning 67%. How will the choice of surface affect the players?
- Analyzing player level, both have mostly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K recently, with Tabur having a slight edge in success at 51.11% compared to Evans' 48% win rate.
- Evans has faced tougher competition over the last year, with opponents averaging a rank of 188.56, compared to Tabur's average opponent rank of 342.21.
- In deciding sets, Tabur holds an advantage by winning 56% of these tight scenarios, while Evans stands at 48%. Could Tabur's edge here be decisive?
- Regarding break point conversion, Evans converts 38.26% of chances, which slightly outperforms Tabur's 35.59%. Will this play a critical role?
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
In examining the current stats, Evans demonstrates a slight advantage in second serve performance and break point conversion, which could be pivotal in tight moments of their upcoming match.
On the other hand, Tabur's superior return game statistics and impressive resilience under pressure may provide the stability needed to navigate challenging situations effectively. Additionally, his robust overall winning percentage and decisive set strength indicate a player capable of seizing critical opportunities.
Considering these aspects, alongside their respective past performances on preferred surfaces, Tabur emerges as the slightly more favored contender to secure a victory in this match, leveraging his overall strong performance metrics.
Evans vs Tabur Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Frances Tiafoe
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Daniel Evans
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Rinky Hijikata
49%
(
47 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Mees Rottgering
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
71%
(
78 of
110)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
50 of
78)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Adam Walton
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
4
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Daniel Evans
77%
(
70 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Daniel Evans
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Billy Harris
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Clement Tabur
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
70)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Arthur Gea
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
1
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
5
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Clement Tabur
50%
(
54 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
56%
(
31 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
82%
(
72 of
88)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Daniel Evans
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (580/402) | Win/Loss | 61% (292/190) |
| 57% (1374/1040) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (640/460) |
| 52% (12156/11084) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5500/4835) |
| 61% (248/157) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (84/41) |
| 46% (54/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (176/108) |
| 62% (181/113) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (32/40) |
| 58% (97/69) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2738 | Aces Total | 1089 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1974 | Total Double Faults | 1093 |
| 1:7:31 | Average Match Time | 1:35:50 |
| 483.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 440.61 |
| 61% (29761/48816) | 1st Serve % | 61% (17757/29204) |
| 71% (21107/29761) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11912/17757) |
| 51% (9674/19054) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5660/11446) |
| 41% (1848/4502) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1475/3302) |
| 38% (18703/48918) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12702/29797) |
| 52% (47/43) | Slam W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 42% (33/46) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (20/26) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (109/99) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 62% (165/103) | Challenger W/L | 51% (67/65) |
| 71% (205/84) | Futures W/L | 65% (222/118) |
| 60% (537/888) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (288/476) |
| 46% (39/84) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (188/356) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (70/124) |
| 54% (180/333) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (80/140) |
| 85% (573/485) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (273/247) |
| 15% (573/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (273/26) |
| 24% (408/96) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (209/45) |
Evans vs. Tabur Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
