Daniel Evans vs Brandon Nakashima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L W L
Form
L W W L W W L W W LHead To Head: Evans 1 - 4 Nakashima
They have played 11 sets in total, with Evans winning 3 and Nakashima winning 8. The last match between Evans and Nakashima was at the cinch Championships - London, 18-06-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Grass, with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 7-5 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Evans | 1 |
| Brandon Nakashima | 4 |
LAST H2H MATCH: cinch Championships - London(18-06-2025)
Brandon Nakashima
Daniel Evans
7
5
7
6
| Evans | Stats | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| 46% (16-19) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (22-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 4 |
| 154 | Ranking | 34 |
| 21 | Highest Rank | 29 |
| 35 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 24 | Titles | 8 |
| 59% (583-405) | Career Total W/L | 61% (248-159) |
| $5,183,865 | Career Prize Money | $3,271,795 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 ret. |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Brandon Nakashima
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 7-6(1) 6-0 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 3 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 8 |
| 49 | Games Won | 63 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 34 |
| 19 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:51:39 | Average Match Time | 1:51:39 |
| 56% (198/352) | 1st Serve % | 63% (225/357) |
| 66% (130/198) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (162/225) |
| 54% (83/154) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (72/132) |
| 38% (10/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (15/36) |
| 34% (123/357) | Return Points Win % | 39% (139/352) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (3/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Evans vs Nakashima Match Preview :
- In the last six months, Nakashima has slightly outperformed Evans on second serve points, winning 47.98% compared to Evans's 44.82%. Will this trend continue?
- Evans has a stronger return game recently, winning 45.61% of points on opponents' second serves, while Nakashima has won 41.99%.
- When facing first serves, Evans has an edge, winning 28.27% of return points, whereas Nakashima captures 23.1% of those points.
- Under pressure, Nakashima excels at saving breakpoints, doing so 56.13% of the time, compared to Evans's 49.17%.
- Overall, Nakashima has a better match win percentage over the past year at 54.93%; Evans's is lower at 47.92%.
- Both players perform best on indoor hard courts, but Nakashima's winning percentage is 70% compared to Evans's 62%.
- Evans has mainly competed in lower-level tournaments (Challengers/ITF), while Nakashima has played on the Main tour, facing higher-ranking opponents.
- Head-to-head, Nakashima leads Evans with a 2-1 match record, winning 6 out of their 9 sets played.
- In previous encounters, Nakashima has won both tiebreaks played against Evans, highlighting his capability in crucial moments.
- When matches go to a deciding set, Evans has a slight edge in overall performance, winning 57% of those sets over the last year, while Nakashima has achieved a 50% win rate.
- Nakashima converts more breakpoint opportunities than Evans, with a conversion rate of 38.66% against Evans's 34.57%.
Editorial Prediction (June 18, 2025, UTC):
In this intriguing matchup, performance trends over the past six months show Nakashima holding a slight overall advantage, particularly in delivering effective second serves. Despite facing higher-ranked opponents, Nakashima maintains a commendable win percentage, which indicates readiness for big matches.
While Evans demonstrates a solid return game, especially against first serves, and a better record when matches extend to deciding sets, Nakashima's ability to save breakpoints and convert critical chances underscores his mental strength under pressure.
Their direct encounters also favor Nakashima, who has displayed dominance in tiebreak scenarios and overall victories. Given these factors, the statistical edge appears to lean towards Nakashima for the upcoming match.
Taking all these elements into account, Brandon Nakashima is likely to emerge as the victor.
Evans vs Nakashima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Daniel Evans
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
11
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
9 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jay Clarke
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Tommy Paul
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Frances Tiafoe
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Daniel Evans
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Brandon Nakashima
76%
(
143 of
188)
1st Serve %
73%
(
145 of
199)
16
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
101 of
143)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
106 of
145)
67%
(
30 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
30%
(
57 of
188)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
61 of
199)
192
Total Points Won
195
|
6-7(5) 7-6(8) 7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Reilly Opelka
77%
(
86 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
78 of
130)
12
Aces
24
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
71 of
86)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
59 of
78)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
23 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
136
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
67%
(
88 of
131)
1st Serve %
62%
(
92 of
148)
21
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
67 of
88)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
65 of
92)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
41 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
59 of
148)
149
Total Points Won
130
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
14
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
127)
13
Aces
23
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
66 of
83)
77%
(
27 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
24 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
37 of
127)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(10) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Brandon Nakashima
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (583/405) | Win/Loss | 61% (248/159) |
| 57% (1381/1049) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (597/411) |
| 52% (12226/11163) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5295/4673) |
| 61% (248/157) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (118/76) |
| 46% (54/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (35/35) |
| 62% (181/113) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (65/29) |
| 58% (100/72) | Grass Win/Loss | 61% (30/19) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.57 |
| 2766 | Aces Total | 2768 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1985 | Total Double Faults | 688 |
| 1:7:49 | Average Match Time | 1:46:8 |
| 482.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 265.32 |
| 61% (30050/49295) | 1st Serve % | 64% (19074/29914) |
| 71% (21305/30050) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (14198/19074) |
| 51% (9766/19244) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (5867/10840) |
| 41% (1863/4536) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (983/2605) |
| 38% (18847/49348) | Return Points Win % | 37% (11505/31126) |
| 52% (48/44) | Slam W/L | 49% (21/22) |
| 42% (33/46) | Masters W/L | 48% (29/31) |
| 43% (20/26) | Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) |
| 52% (111/101) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (85/59) |
| 62% (165/103) | Challenger W/L | 69% (93/41) |
| 71% (205/84) | Futures W/L | 74% (17/6) |
| 60% (539/892) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (219/359) |
| 47% (40/86) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (25/44) |
| 53% (188/357) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (127/230) |
| 54% (182/335) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (63/129) |
| 85% (575/487) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (250/214) |
| 15% (575/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (250/36) |
| 24% (412/97) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (156/32) |
Evans vs. Nakashima Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
