D. Cukierman
To Win
V. Vacherot
To Win
Daniel Cukierman vs Norbert Gombos Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L L W L W L
Form
W L W W L W L L W LHead To Head: Cukierman 1 - 0 Gombos
They have played 3 sets in total, with Cukierman winning 2 and Gombos winning 1. The last match between Cukierman and Gombos was at the Glasgow Challenger, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Daniel Cukierman getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Cukierman | 1 |
| Norbert Gombos | 0 |
Glasgow Challenger(16-02-2025)
6
3
3
6
6
3
Upcoming Match
23 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gauff VS Linette PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Svitolina VS Swiatek PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Norbert Gombos
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
15
Games Won
12
3
Aces (Total)
7
6
Total Double Faults
2
1:44:45
Average Match Time
1:44:45
63% (52/83)
1st Serve %
65% (51/78)
81% (42/52)
1st Serve Win %
78% (40/51)
48% (15/31)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (11/27)
100% (2/2)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (1/2)
35% (27/78)
Return Points Win %
31% (26/83)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Daniel Cukierman
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Norbert Gombos
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Daniel Cukierman
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Daniel Cukierman
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
16
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Daniel Cukierman
73%
(
61 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
0
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Daniel Cukierman
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Norbert Gombos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Norbert Gombos
49%
(
58 of
118)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
6
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
36%
(
43 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
6-1 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Szymon Kielan
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Norbert Gombos
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Norbert Gombos
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Norbert Gombos
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Raphael Calzi
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Norbert Gombos
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
11
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Luka Mikrut
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
57% (255/193)
Win/Loss
56% (546/423)
56% (571/442)
Sets Win/Loss
55% (1264/1044)
53% (4829/4266)
Games Win/Loss
52% (11640/10732)
57% (181/134)
Hard Win/Loss
56% (120/93)
59% (49/34)
Clay Win/Loss
58% (265/190)
51% (25/24)
Indoor Hard W/L
55% (152/126)
0% (0/1)
Grass Win/Loss
39% (9/14)
0.16
Aces Per Game
0.35
720
Aces Total
3861
0.23
Double Faults Per Game
0.25
1033
Total Double Faults
2700
1:11:24
Average Match Time
1:16:50
417.62
Average Opponent Rank
515.44
63% (13485/21352)
1st Serve %
60% (33369/55422)
66% (8903/13485)
1st Serve Win %
72% (24071/33369)
49% (3827/7867)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (10937/22047)
47% (1136/2411)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (2086/5276)
43% (9322/21594)
Return Points Win %
39% (21673/56290)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
46% (31/36)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
52% (15/14)
38% (5/8)
Cups W/L
36% (8/14)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
48% (59/63)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
48% (45/49)
Challenger W/L
57% (299/225)
60% (205/135)
Futures W/L
66% (134/70)
57% (251/439)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
57% (529/934)
50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
37% (10/27)
48% (43/89)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
53% (197/375)
49% (61/124)
Deciding Set Win %
52% (176/336)
88% (253/222)
1st Set Won, Won Match
84% (537/450)
12% (253/30)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
16% (537/87)
16% (194/32)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
22% (430/95)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
