Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Cukierman vs Kyle Seelig Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cukierman vs Seelig analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Cukierman vs Kyle Seelig Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cukierman has won 49.71% of points on his second serve, while Seelig has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cukierman, in recent form, has won 55.96% of his opponent's second serve points, while Seelig has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.54% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cukierman has saved 49.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seelig has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cukierman has won 61.29% of matches played (W/L 38/ 24), with Seelig winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cukierman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 43/ 27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Seelig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 40/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Cukierman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 24/ 16), where as Seelig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cukierman winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cukierman winning 2 and Seelig winning 0. The last match between Cukierman and Seelig was at the M25 Netanya, 29-05-2022, Final, Hard with Daniel Cukierman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cukierman and Seelig have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cukierman winning 0 times and Seelig 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cukierman winning 0, and Seelig 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cukierman has played against opponents with an average rank of 241.5 while Seelig has played against players with an average rank of 161.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cukierman has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seelig has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cukierman has converted 44.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seelig has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cukierman 1 - 0 Seelig
413
Rank
339
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
886
Rank
349
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
58% (245-178)
Career Total W/L
64% (143-81)
62% (13-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$4,125
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Cukierman | Kyle Seelig |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:4:0 | 1:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (30/45) | 45% (18/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (21/30) | 39% (7/18) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 36% (8/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (25/40) | 36% (16/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Kyle Seelig
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Cukierman | Kyle Seelig |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (13/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (30/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (243/197) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 261.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (830/1333) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (571/830) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (245/503) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (76/165) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (635/1451) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (13/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Ignacio Carou
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Daniel Cukierman
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kyle Seelig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Burnett
Player
Kyle Seelig
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Kyle Seelig
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Kyle Seelig
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
Benjamin Kittay
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Darian King
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
A.j. Catanzariti
70%
(
80 of
114)
1st Serve %
75%
(
92 of
123)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
57 of
92)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
Leo Vithoontien
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
46
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Kyle Seelig
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
9
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cukierman Vs Seelig Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
