Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Cukierman vs Govind Nanda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cukierman vs Nanda analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Cukierman vs Govind Nanda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cukierman has won 49.71% of points on his second serve, while Nanda has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cukierman, in recent form, has won 55.96% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nanda has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.54% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cukierman has saved 49.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nanda has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cukierman has won 61.29% of matches played (W/L 38/ 24), with Nanda winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cukierman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 43/ 27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Nanda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Cukierman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 24/ 16), where as Nanda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cukierman winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cukierman winning 2 and Nanda winning 1. The last match between Cukierman and Nanda was at the M25 Calabasas, 25-03-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Daniel Cukierman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cukierman and Nanda have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cukierman winning 1 times and Nanda 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cukierman winning 0, and Nanda 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cukierman has played against opponents with an average rank of 241.5 while Nanda has played against players with an average rank of 101.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cukierman has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nanda has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cukierman has converted 44.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nanda has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cukierman 1 - 0 Nanda
413
Rank
339
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
835
Rank
339
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
58% (245-178)
Career Total W/L
58% (112-80)
62% (13-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$56,390
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Cukierman | Govind Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:47:0 | 2:47:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (79/118) | 57% (51/89) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (41/79) | 59% (30/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (17/39) | 32% (12/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (8/14) | 33% (7/21) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (47/89) | 51% (60/118) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Govind Nanda
67%
(
79 of
118)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
51%
(
60 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Cukierman | Govind Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (13/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (30/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (243/197) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 261.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (830/1333) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (571/830) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (245/503) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (76/165) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (635/1451) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (13/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Ignacio Carou
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Daniel Cukierman
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Govind Nanda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Thomas Brown
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Govind Nanda
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Isaiah Strode
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Govind Nanda
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Aidan Kim
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Segura
Player
Govind Nanda
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cukierman Vs Nanda Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
