MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Daniel Cukierman vs Cem Ilkel Head-to-Head, At Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

Cukierman VS Ilkel H2h Matches played

Cukierman VS Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Daniel Cukierman Cem Ilkel
All Head to Head Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 13 8
Aces (Total) 0 0
Total Double Faults 0 0
Average Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Rubber 2
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Daniel Cukierman
58% ( 43 of 74)
1st Serve %
56% ( 40 of 72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
79% ( 34 of 43)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 25 of 40)
52% ( 16 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 16 of 32)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
32% ( 24 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 31 of 72)
81
Total Points Won
65
L
6-2 3-6 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Daniel Cukierman
52% ( 45 of 87)
1st Serve %
66% ( 64 of 97)
16
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80% ( 36 of 45)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 45 of 64)
50% ( 21 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 14 of 33)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 30 of 87)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 38 of 97)
95
Total Points Won
89
L
3-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Daniel Cukierman
73% ( 61 of 83)
1st Serve %
61% ( 57 of 93)
0
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
70% ( 43 of 61)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 37 of 57)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 20 of 36)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
34% ( 28 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 36 of 93)
91
Total Points Won
85
L
6-4 3-6 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Sandro Kopp
Player
Daniel Cukierman
64% ( 29 of 45)
1st Serve %
57% ( 34 of 60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
72% ( 21 of 29)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 18 of 34)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
31% ( 14 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 32 of 60)
63
Total Points Won
42
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
Rubber 2
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Dan Added
Player
Daniel Cukierman
71% ( 59 of 83)
1st Serve %
76% ( 56 of 74)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
66% ( 39 of 59)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 40 of 56)
71% ( 17 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 5 of 18)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
33% ( 27 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 29 of 74)
85
Total Points Won
72
L
6-3 3-6 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Hugo Cardinaud
67% ( 36 of 54)
1st Serve %
65% ( 36 of 55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81% ( 29 of 36)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 22 of 36)
44% ( 8 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 5 of 19)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
31% ( 17 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 28 of 55)
65
Total Points Won
44
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Adrian Andreev
Player
Daniel Cukierman
68% ( 48 of 71)
1st Serve %
70% ( 60 of 86)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
65% ( 31 of 48)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 36 of 60)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
39% ( 28 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 39 of 86)
82
Total Points Won
75
L
7-6(7) 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Jonas Forejtek
64% ( 60 of 94)
1st Serve %
60% ( 45 of 75)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
68% ( 41 of 60)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 24 of 45)
32% ( 11 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 10 of 30)
64% ( 7 of 11)
Break Points Won
31% ( 4 of 13)
45% ( 42 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 41 of 75)
93
Total Points Won
76
W
3-6 6-4 6-0 H2H

Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pieter De Lange
59% ( 44 of 75)
1st Serve %
63% ( 59 of 93)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
66% ( 29 of 44)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 36 of 59)
61% ( 19 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 13 of 34)
41% ( 7 of 17)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
36% ( 27 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 44 of 93)
92
Total Points Won
76
W
6-7(3) 6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Lucas Gerch
62% ( 58 of 93)
1st Serve %
70% ( 67 of 96)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
5
72% ( 42 of 58)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 43 of 67)
60% ( 21 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
32% ( 30 of 93)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 37 of 96)
100
Total Points Won
89
W
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) H2H
QF
cross
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Cem Ilkel
76% ( 29 of 38)
1st Serve %
60% ( 27 of 45)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69% ( 20 of 29)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
33% ( 3 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 4 of 18)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
39% ( 15 of 38)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 27 of 45)
50
Total Points Won
33
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Lucas Gerch
74% ( 57 of 77)
1st Serve %
66% ( 54 of 82)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75% ( 43 of 57)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 32 of 54)
45% ( 9 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 13 of 28)
23% ( 3 of 13)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
32% ( 25 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 37 of 82)
89
Total Points Won
70
W
6-3 7-6(2) H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Saba Purtseladze
66% ( 44 of 67)
1st Serve %
60% ( 44 of 73)
2
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
64% ( 28 of 44)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 33 of 44)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
24% ( 7 of 29)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
39% ( 26 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 33 of 73)
74
Total Points Won
66
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adam Jones
61% ( 27 of 44)
1st Serve %
72% ( 34 of 47)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
32% ( 11 of 34)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 7 of 13)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
30% ( 13 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 29 of 47)
60
Total Points Won
31
W
6-1 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Abdulmajeed Bukhari
57% ( 17 of 30)
1st Serve %
70% ( 28 of 40)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
88% ( 15 of 17)
1st Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
77% ( 10 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
8% ( 1 of 12)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
17% ( 5 of 30)
Rtn Points Won
70% ( 28 of 40)
53
Total Points Won
17
W
6-0 6-0 H2H
SF
cross
Tibo Colson
Player
Cem Ilkel
56% ( 41 of 73)
1st Serve %
61% ( 49 of 80)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73% ( 30 of 41)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 31 of 49)
63% ( 20 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 19 of 31)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
32% ( 23 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 30 of 80)
80
Total Points Won
73
L
7-6(5) 7-5 H2H
QF
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yanaki Milev
58% ( 39 of 67)
1st Serve %
67% ( 40 of 60)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
79% ( 31 of 39)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 29 of 40)
64% ( 18 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 12 of 20)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
27% ( 18 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
32% ( 19 of 60)
68
Total Points Won
59
W
6-3 7-6(4) H2H
R2
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yuta Kikuchi
56% ( 36 of 64)
1st Serve %
68% ( 42 of 62)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72% ( 26 of 36)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 20 of 42)
54% ( 15 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
75% ( 15 of 20)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
36% ( 23 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 27 of 62)
68
Total Points Won
58
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Daniel Cukierman Cem Ilkel
YTD Win/Loss 57% (253/191) 56% (417/329)
Sets Win/Loss 56% (567/437) 54% (936/791)
Games Win/Loss 53% (4784/4218) 51% (8447/8000)
Hard Win/Loss 57% (181/134) 61% (267/173)
Clay Win/Loss 59% (48/33) 45% (57/71)
Indoor Hard W/L 51% (24/23) 55% (92/76)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/1) 10% (1/9)
Aces Per Game 0.16 0.34
Aces Total 706 2732
Double Faults Per Game 0.23 0.17
Total Double Faults 1015 1359
Average Match Time 1:11:8 1:14:14
Average Opponent Rank 415.54 526.04
1st Serve % 63% (13290/21041) 58% (23066/39554)
1st Serve Win % 66% (8769/13290) 70% (16192/23066)
2nd Serve Win % 49% (3776/7751) 51% (8368/16488)
Break Points Won % (Total) 47% (1126/2391) 40% (1548/3863)
Return Points Win % 43% (9208/21303) 39% (15500/39946)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 32% (7/15)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 67% (2/1)
Cups W/L 38% (5/8) 32% (7/15)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/1) 18% (5/23)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 48% (43/47) 52% (175/159)
Futures W/L 60% (205/135) 66% (221/116)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 57% (250/436) 56% (406/728)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 50% (1/2) 40% (4/10)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 49% (43/88) 54% (143/267)
Deciding Set Win % 49% (60/122) 55% (124/225)
1st Set Won, Won Match 88% (251/220) 85% (407/345)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 12% (251/30) 15% (407/60)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 17% (192/32) 21% (338/70)

See recent tennis photos of Cukierman and Ilkel

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Cem Ilkel

M15 Zahra

Lapalu vs Ilkel H2H Prediction, could play in The Final

Nikles vs Ilkel H2H Prediction, could play in The Final

Beauge vs Ilkel H2H Prediction, could play in The Final

Duran vs Ilkel H2H Prediction, could play in The Final

Ilkel vs Karlovskiy H2H Prediction, could play in The Semifinals

Ilkel vs Alkaya H2H Prediction, could play in The Semifinals

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions