Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Brands vs Matteo Viola Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brands vs Viola analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Brands vs Matteo Viola Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brands has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Viola has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brands, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Viola has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brands has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Viola has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brands has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Viola winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brands has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 165/ 141). Viola has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 119/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Brands winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Brands winning 1 and Viola winning 4. The last match between Brands and Viola was at the St. Brieuc Challenger, 27-03-2019, Second, I.hard with Matteo Viola getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brands and Viola have played a deciding set 1 times, with Brands winning 0 times and Viola 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Brands winning 0, and Viola 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brands has played against opponents with an average rank of while Viola has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brands has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Viola has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brands has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Viola has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brands 0 - 2 Viola
Ret.
Rank
51
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
831
Rank
118
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
56% (482-380)
Career Total W/L
53% (563-490)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$765,635
Career Prize Money
$206,441
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Brands | Matteo Viola |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 23 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:17 | 1:36:17 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (108/144) | 79% (120/152) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (75/108) | 72% (86/120) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (15/36) | 56% (18/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (48/152) | 38% (54/144) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Matteo Viola
Player
Daniel Brands
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 7-5 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Daniel Brands
85%
(
75 of
88)
1st Serve %
85%
(
73 of
86)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Brands | Matteo Viola |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Brands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Daniel Brands
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
18
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
58 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
36 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
134
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Blaz Rola
66%
(
93 of
140)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
16
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
47 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
123
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(5) 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Mark Whitehouse
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Alex Bolt
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
67 of
88)
20
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Ryan Peniston
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Daniel Brands
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Viola Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Matteo Viola
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Omar Giacalone
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Matteo Viola
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Pavel Nejedly
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Matteo Viola
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Matteo Viola
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Matteo Viola
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Brands Vs Viola Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
