Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Brands vs Jacob Fearnley Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brands vs Fearnley analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Brands vs Jacob Fearnley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brands has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fearnley has won 51.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brands, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fearnley has won 62.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brands has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fearnley has saved 67.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brands has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fearnley winning 85.71% (W/L 24/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brands has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 165/ 141). Fearnley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 86% (W/L 25/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brands winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Brands winning 2 and Fearnley winning 0. The last match between Brands and Fearnley was at the Glasgow Challenger, 28-04-2018, Q1 round, I.hard with Daniel Brands getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:51:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brands and Fearnley have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brands winning 0 times and Fearnley 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Brands winning 0, and Fearnley 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brands has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fearnley has played against players with an average rank of 212.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brands has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fearnley has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brands has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fearnley has converted 47.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brands 1 - 0 Fearnley
Ret.
Rank
51
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
510
Rank
506
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
56% (482-380)
Career Total W/L
78% (35-10)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
100% (8-0)
$765,635
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Brands | Jacob Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:51:20 | 0:51:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (31/42) | 62% (36/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 87% (27/31) | 56% (20/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (6/11) | 41% (9/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (29/58) | 21% (9/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Brands
Player
Jacob Fearnley
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Brands | Jacob Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (8/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 94% (16/1) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (101/50) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (8/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.57 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.49 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:21:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 309 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (271/451) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (212/271) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (94/180) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (36/76) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (246/506) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (8/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (8/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Daniel Brands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Daniel Brands
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
18
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
58 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
36 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
134
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Blaz Rola
66%
(
93 of
140)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
16
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
47 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
123
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(5) 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Mark Whitehouse
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Alex Bolt
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
67 of
88)
20
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Ryan Peniston
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Daniel Brands
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Federico Iannaccone
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Jonas Forejtek
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Yanki Erel
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Kylian Collignon
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tim Handel
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Alexey Vatutin
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
13
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
8
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Harold Van Raemdonck
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Thijmen Loof
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
8
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Jacob Fearnley
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
11
Total Points Won
4
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Brands Vs Fearnley Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
