D. Sweeny
To Win
B. Ellis
To Win
Dane Sweeny vs Luca Van Assche Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W W W
Form
L W L W L W W L W WH2H: Sweeny 1 - 0 Assche
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sweeny winning 2 and Assche winning 0. The last match between Sweeny and Assche was at the Canberra Challenger, 30-12-2024, First, Hard with Dane Sweeny getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dane Sweeny | 1 |
| Luca Van Assche | 0 |
Canberra Challenger(30-12-2024)
6
4
6
4
Upcoming Match
23 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Mensik VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
22 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Anisimova VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
23 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Dane Sweeny
Player
Luca Van Assche
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
8
0
Aces (Total)
3
4
Total Double Faults
6
1:29:44
Average Match Time
1:29:44
64% (37/58)
1st Serve %
54% (36/67)
65% (24/37)
1st Serve Win %
58% (21/36)
62% (13/21)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (16/31)
40% (4/10)
Break Points Won % (Total)
67% (2/3)
45% (30/67)
Return Points Win %
36% (21/58)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dane Sweeny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
6
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
10
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Omar Jasika
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
24%
(
6 of
25)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-0 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Ethan Cook
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Dane Sweeny
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
6
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Stefan Storch
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Dane Sweeny
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Scott Jones
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Luca Van Assche Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Matteo Martineau
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Hugo Grenier
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Luca Van Assche
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
10
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(2) 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Jan Choinski
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
6
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Luca Van Assche
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
10
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Luca Van Assche
51%
(
57 of
112)
1st Serve %
71%
(
82 of
116)
6
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
50 of
82)
49%
(
27 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
55% (178/143)
Win/Loss
56% (159/127)
53% (397/357)
Sets Win/Loss
52% (359/327)
51% (3646/3466)
Games Win/Loss
51% (3280/3159)
59% (145/102)
Hard Win/Loss
42% (19/26)
44% (17/22)
Clay Win/Loss
61% (77/50)
37% (7/12)
Indoor Hard W/L
56% (58/46)
56% (9/7)
Grass Win/Loss
50% (5/5)
0.2
Aces Per Game
0.28
690
Aces Total
896
0.29
Double Faults Per Game
0.25
1009
Total Double Faults
782
1:38:40
Average Match Time
1:45:40
412.85
Average Opponent Rank
311.54
63% (13228/21103)
1st Serve %
60% (11941/19760)
66% (8665/13228)
1st Serve Win %
68% (8132/11941)
51% (3990/7875)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (3925/7819)
43% (927/2158)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (848/1958)
41% (8409/20731)
Return Points Win %
40% (8084/20245)
47% (7/8)
Slam W/L
35% (6/11)
60% (3/2)
Masters W/L
20% (3/12)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
100% (1/0)
43% (3/4)
Main Tour W/L
42% (23/32)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
42% (49/68)
Challenger W/L
63% (92/55)
66% (116/61)
Futures W/L
67% (34/17)
55% (175/317)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
56% (149/268)
67% (2/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
33% (4/12)
49% (41/83)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
53% (52/98)
62% (68/109)
Deciding Set Win %
60% (62/104)
88% (154/136)
1st Set Won, Won Match
84% (137/115)
12% (154/18)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
16% (137/22)
25% (167/42)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
28% (149/42)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
