Dana Kremer vs Fatma Al Nabhani Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kremer vs Nabhani analysis and find out who is favored!
Dana Kremer vs Fatma Al Nabhani Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kremer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nabhani has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kremer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nabhani has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kremer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nabhani has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kremer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nabhani winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kremer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 16/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Nabhani has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 81/ 62), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kremer winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kremer winning 2 and Nabhani winning 1. The last match between Kremer and Nabhani was at the Antalya, 21-04-2016, Second, Hard with Dana Kremer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kremer and Nabhani have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kremer winning 1 times and Nabhani 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Kremer winning 2, and Nabhani 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kremer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nabhani has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kremer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nabhani has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kremer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nabhani has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kremer 1 - 0 Nabhani
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Ret.
Rank
472
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
362
High
32
Age
Plays
10
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
Form
57% (102-76)
Career Total W/L
54% (277-237)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,900
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Dana Kremer | Fatma Al Nabhani |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 19 | 11 |
Avg Match Time | 3:0:0 | 3:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (60/105) | 61% (67/110) |
1st Serve Win% | 58% (35/60) | 55% (37/67) |
2nd Serve Win% | 31% (14/45) | 30% (13/43) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 73% (8/11) | 59% (10/17) |
Return Points W% | 55% (60/110) | 53% (56/105) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(2) |
Dana Kremer
Player
Fatma Al Nabhani
57%
(
60 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
110)
1
Aces
0
19
Double Faults
11
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
31%
(
14 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
53%
(
56 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
60 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Dana Kremer | Fatma Al Nabhani |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Dana Kremer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Yuliya Lysa
Player
Dana Kremer
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
48
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
F |
Dana Kremer
Player
Julie Gervais
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
41 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Dana Kremer
Player
Catherine Chantraine
45%
(
42 of
93)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
33%
(
17 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dana Kremer
Player
Irina Cantos Siemers
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
110)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
51%
(
49 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
58 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dana Kremer
Player
Kassandra Davesne
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
69%
(
20 of
29)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
49
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Catherine Chantraine
Player
Dana Kremer
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
39%
(
20 of
51)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Vlada Katic
Player
Dana Kremer
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Dana Kremer
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
39 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Fatma Al Nabhani Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Elena Pridankina
Player
Fatma Al Nabhani
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Fatma Al Nabhani
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fatma Al Nabhani
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vanda Lukacs
Player
Fatma Al Nabhani
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
43
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tamara Curovic
Player
Fatma Al Nabhani
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Julia Stamatova
Player
Fatma Al Nabhani
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
98)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
11
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fatma Al Nabhani
Player
Margarita Ignatjeva
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
77)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rosa Vicens Mas
Player
Fatma Al Nabhani
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dorka Drahota Szabo
Player
Fatma Al Nabhani
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
En Shuo Liang
Player
Fatma Al Nabhani
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more