Dan Martin vs Keegan Rice Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In terms of recent second serve effectiveness, Dan Martin shows stronger performance, capturing 45.97% of points compared to Keegan Rice's 39.83%.
• Looking at their return game, Martin again edges out, winning 45.15% of opponent's second serve points, slightly higher than Rice's 44.61%.
• Conversely, Rice outperforms Martin in returning first serves, with a 32.06% success rate, while Martin stands at 23.73%.
• How do pressure situations affect their games? Martin has a higher breakpoint save percentage of 58.26%, whereas Rice saves 47.06% under similar pressures.
• Overall, Keegan Rice displays a stronger match win record over the last year with a 66.67% win-rate, while Dan Martin's stands at 51.47%.
• Considering surface preference, Martin excels on clay with a 55% win rate, whereas Rice is most successful on hard courts, where he also holds a 55% win rate.
• Analyzing the level of tournaments, Martin's victories come majorly from Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at a rate of 57.14%, while Rice excels at the same with a 73.33% win rate, hinting at a slight edge in performance level.
• Quality of opponents shows variance as well, with Martin facing players with an average rank of 414.29, compared to Rice's players who have a more challenging average rank of 270.86.
• How do they perform in deciding sets? Martin has the upper hand, winning 47% of deciding sets, versus Rice's 40%.
• Previous matches at this event haven't been detailed here, but current form might sway predictions as tournaments progress.

Editorial Prediction (November 14, 2025, UTC):

Looking at recent performance statistics, Dan Martin's superior second serve and his ability to win critical points under pressure give him an edge in individual skills. Such strengths are often pivotal in closely contested matches.

Although Keegan Rice exhibits a better overall win percentage and has competed against more highly-ranked opponents, the small advantage in returning first serves could be critical. However, he is somewhat less effective in high-pressure situations compared to Martin.

Considering each player's preferred playing surfaces and performance levels at similar tournament tiers, Rice's consistency against stronger opponents cannot be overlooked, hinting he might be more adept at facing tougher competition.

Taking all these factors into account, while Dan Martin's numbers in specific areas show his technical prowess, the comprehensive analysis suggests Keegan Rice is the marginal favorite to win this match, courtesy of his overall tournament experience and higher-success encounters with stronger competition.