Dan Martin vs Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L L L L
Form
L W W L L W W L W LHead-To-Head: Martin 1 - 0 Schulenburg
They have played 2 sets in total, with Martin winning 2 and Schulenburg winning 0. The last match between Martin and Schulenburg was at the M15 Orlando, 14-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Dan Martin getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dan Martin | 1 |
| Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Orlando(14-05-2025)
Dan Martin
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
6
4
6
1
| Martin | Stats | Schulenburg |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (23-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (12-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 562 | Ranking | N/A |
| 513 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 26 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (94-85) | Career Total W/L | 58% (57-41) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alcaraz VS Agut PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
21 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Blancaneaux VS Tseng PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
21 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Martin VS Schulenburg H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Dan Martin
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Martin VS Schulenburg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:22:38 | Average Match Time | 1:22:38 |
| 65% (30/46) | 1st Serve % | 56% (30/54) |
| 67% (20/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (17/30) |
| 56% (9/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 48% (26/54) | Return Points Win % | 37% (17/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martin vs Schulenburg Match Preview :
- Recently, Schulenburg has a slight edge in winning points on their second serve, with 44.97%, compared to Martin's 42.86%. Could this minor difference impact the match outcome? Given the close stats, it might play a role.
- In return game performance, Schulenburg also holds an advantage by winning 48.02% of opponent's second serve points, whereas Martin claims 46.34%. On first serve returns, Schulenburg is notably stronger, with 32.81% against Martin's 25.46%.
- Under pressure, Martin has a slight edge in saving breakpoints, managing to save 54.28%, while Schulenburg's rate is 53.13%. This could be crucial during tight game moments.
- Overall match performance in the past year favors Schulenburg, who has won 57.14% of matches compared to Martin's 55.41%.
- Looking at surfaces, Martin excels on clay with a 58% win rate, while Schulenburg shines on hard courts, boasting a 69% win rate. Will surface type impact their head-to-head performance?
- In terms of competition level, Schulenburg has performed against stronger opponents, indicated by facing an average rank of 251.14, whereas Martin's opponents ranked around 399.43 on average.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Martin's winning trend favors them, as they have won 48% of deciding sets compared to Schulenburg's 29%.
- Schulenburg is more effective at converting breakpoints lately, showing 47.62% conversion against Martin's 30.16%. This could dictate vital turning points in the match.
Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent stats and performance trends, we observe that while both players have their strengths, Schulenburg appears to hold a slight advantage in key performance areas.
Schulenburg's effectiveness in returning serves and converting breakpoints could give them an edge that Martin might struggle to contend with, especially since Schulenburg has consistently performed better on hard courts, a common match surface.
Nevertheless, Martin's proficiency in deciding sets could make them a formidable opponent if the match extends into a final set showdown.
Based on this analysis, Schulenburg seems the more likely winner in this upcoming face-off given their superior recent form and performance metrics.
Martin vs Schulenburg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Dan Martin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pranav Kumar
Player
Dan Martin
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Dan Martin
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
44
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Dan Martin
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kuang Qing Xu
Player
Dan Martin
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Oliver Okonkwo
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Jesse Flores
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
0
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
15 of
55)
54
Total Points Won
65
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
52
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Giacomo Crisostomo
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Gianluca Cadenasso
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Aaron Funk
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
48%
(
47 of
97)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Bynoe
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
96)
5
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
7
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
51%
(
54 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (94/85) | Win/Loss | 58% (57/41) |
| 52% (208/189) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (122/96) |
| 52% (1909/1753) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1061/994) |
| 51% (46/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) |
| 58% (30/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (40/29) |
| 49% (18/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46% (6/7) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 340 | Aces Total | 174 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 340 | Total Double Faults | 201 |
| 1:23:4 | Average Match Time | 1:18:18 |
| 364.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 395.8 |
| 61% (5586/9096) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2961/4998) |
| 66% (3711/5586) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (1914/2961) |
| 49% (1736/3510) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (966/2037) |
| 42% (364/873) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (213/483) |
| 39% (3445/8830) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2051/5071) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (13/18) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 55% (81/66) | Futures W/L | 61% (57/36) |
| 53% (92/175) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (54/95) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 46% (19/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (15/24) |
| 49% (20/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (13/23) |
| 85% (99/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (53/48) |
| 15% (99/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (53/5) |
| 13% (80/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (45/9) |
Martin vs. Schulenburg Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
