Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Damien Wenger vs Juan Pablo Paz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wenger vs Paz analysis and find out who is favored!
Damien Wenger vs Juan Pablo Paz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wenger has won 50.32% of points on his second serve, while Paz has won 46.9%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wenger, in recent form, has won 55.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paz has won 49.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.21% and 34.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wenger has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paz has saved 51.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wenger has won 63.51% of matches played (W/L 47/ 27), with Paz winning 53.62% (W/L 37/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wenger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 238/ 121), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Paz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 439/ 299), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Wenger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 17), where as Paz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.38% of matches (W/L 32/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wenger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wenger winning 2 and Paz winning 0. The last match between Wenger and Paz was at the Sanremo Challenger, 03-04-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Damien Wenger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:23.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wenger and Paz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wenger winning 0 times and Paz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wenger winning 1, and Paz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wenger has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.05 while Paz has played against players with an average rank of 313.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wenger has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paz has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wenger has converted 44.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paz has converted 41.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wenger 1 - 0 Paz
376
Rank
363
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
569
Rank
284
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
64% (249-138)
Career Total W/L
59% (448-317)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,105
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Damien Wenger | Juan Pablo Paz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:23 | 1:41:23 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (48/72) | 52% (33/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (36/48) | 64% (21/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (13/24) | 43% (13/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (29/63) | 32% (23/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Damien Wenger
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Damien Wenger | Juan Pablo Paz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 41% (7/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (26/19) | 47% (18/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (223/197) | 49% (176/183) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 41% (7/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 37 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:23 | 1:48:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 355.3 | 251.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (800/1315) | 64% (707/1110) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (504/800) | 65% (457/707) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (262/515) | 49% (199/403) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (79/172) | 43% (49/113) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (632/1401) | 40% (466/1164) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (9/6) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 64% (11/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 36% (11/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (6/0) |
Damien Wenger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Anton Matusevich
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Damien Wenger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Daniel Cukierman
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Damien Wenger
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Luca Fantini
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Damien Wenger
72%
(
76 of
105)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(2) 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Juan Pablo Paz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Petr Brunclik
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Boris Kozlov
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Yshai Oliel
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Wenger Vs Paz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
