Dalibor Svrcina vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W L L
Form
L W W W W W W L W LH2H: Svrcina 0 - 0 Fatic
They have played 0 sets in total, with Svrcina winning 0 and Fatic winning 0. The last match between Svrcina and Fatic was at the Perugia Challenger, 13-06-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 7-6(6).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dalibor Svrcina | 0 |
| Nerman Fatic | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Perugia Challenger(13-06-2025)
Nerman Fatic
Dalibor Svrcina
6
4
7
6
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Lajal VS Lemaitre PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kirchheimer VS Nanda PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Svrcina vs Fatic Match Preview :
- Recent second serve performance shows Fatic winning 41.52% of points compared to Svrcina's 38.67%. Could this give Fatic a slight edge?
- Svrcina excels in return games, capturing 51.24% of points on opponents' second serves, while Fatic wins 43.69%.
- For first serve return effectiveness, Svrcina leads again with 32.34% against Fatic's 30%.
- Under pressure, Fatic saves 51.84% of breakpoints, narrowly outperforming Svrcina at 48.53%. Is this enough for an in-game advantage?
- Svrcina's overall win rate in the past year is 65.52%, while Fatic boasts a higher win rate of 70.97%. Who is more consistent?
- Svrcina performs best on indoor hard courts with a 62% win rate, whereas Fatic excels on clay with a 61% win percentage.
- Both players have primarily competed at the Challengers/ITF > $10K level, with Svrcina having a slightly better performance rate of 66.15% to Fatic's 61.29%.
- Svrcina has faced tougher opponents, with an average rank of 291.6 versus Fatic's 349.47. Does stiffer competition give Svrcina the upper hand?
- In deciding set scenarios, Svrcina wins 69% of these matches, marginally higher than Fatic's 68% success rate.
- Current event form still needs consideration, but historically Svrcina converts 38.83% of breakpoint opportunities, slightly ahead of Fatic's 37.89%.
Editorial Prediction (June 12, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match displays an interesting mix of capabilities between Svrcina and Fatic. Fatic leads slightly in second serve points won, which could play a crucial role in sustaining longer rallies and maintaining pressure on his opponent. However, Svrcina's superior return game, particularly on opponent second serves, will likely provide valuable opportunities to break Fatic's serve.
When under pressure, Fatic demonstrates slightly better breakpoint saving skills, which could prove pivotal during critical moments in the match. Nonetheless, Svrcina's track record against higher-ranked opponents and his ability to excel on indoor hard surfaces suggest he may have the resilience and tactical edge he needs to prevail.
With both players closely matched in several areas and particularly adept at handling deciding sets, the match could be quite a competitive encounter. Yet, given Svrcina's stronger return game and experience against tougher opponents, he appears poised to be the more likely winner in this head-to-head matchup.
Svrcina vs Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Dalibor Svrcina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Dodig
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Omar Jasika
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Hynek Barton
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Matteo Martineau
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Henri Squire
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
67 of
93)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Nerman Fatic
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pierluigi Basile
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Lajovic
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
64%
(
91 of
143)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
58%
(
30 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
41%
(
58 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
109)
124
Total Points Won
128
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Andrea Picchione
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (196/140) | Win/Loss | 58% (391/278) |
| 56% (438/349) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (863/639) |
| 52% (3765/3433) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7354/6529) |
| 61% (75/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (41/40) |
| 57% (105/80) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (331/212) |
| 61% (14/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (19/24) |
| 33% (2/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 343 | Aces Total | 1493 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1343 | Total Double Faults | 1472 |
| 1:40:5 | Average Match Time | 1:19:42 |
| 387.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 508.06 |
| 68% (15478/22881) | 1st Serve % | 67% (22970/34460) |
| 62% (9599/15478) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15000/22970) |
| 43% (3196/7403) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5503/11490) |
| 49% (1375/2831) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1895/4061) |
| 45% (10446/22963) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15057/34806) |
| 48% (12/13) | Slam W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 33% (4/8) | Main Tour W/L | 25% (3/9) |
| 57% (116/89) | Challenger W/L | 53% (112/99) |
| 70% (64/28) | Futures W/L | 63% (271/160) |
| 57% (184/320) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (382/643) |
| 60% (6/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 51% (34/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (79/151) |
| 58% (64/111) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (99/184) |
| 85% (189/161) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (383/338) |
| 15% (189/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (383/41) |
| 24% (147/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (286/54) |
Svrcina vs. Fatic Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
