Dalibor Svrcina vs Luca Van Assche Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Assche outperforms Svrcina in recent second serve points, winning 44.32% compared to Svrcina’s 38.43%. Could this give Assche the upper hand?
• Return Game: Both players have similar success against opponents' second serves, with Assche slightly ahead at 51.83% compared to Svrcina’s 51.79%. However, Svrcina edges Assche on first serve returns, securing 32.33% versus Assche’s 28.45%.
• Pressure Handling: Assche displays stronger breakpoint defense, saving 60.1% in recent matches, while Svrcina saves 48.46%.
• Overall Win Rate: In the past year, Svrcina has a better win rate at 64.77% against Assche’s 49.21%.
• Surface Performance: Svrcina excels indoors hard courts with a 62% win rate, while Assche has a 60% win rate on clay. Could the surface impact the match’s outcome?
• Level of Competition: Svrcina has been competing at a higher percentage in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with a win rate of 65.15%, indicating consistent performance at mid-tier levels.
• Opponent Quality: Assche has faced stronger opponents on average, with their opponents having an average rank of 206.81 compared to Svrcina’s 279.81.
• Deciding Set Performance: If the match reaches a deciding set, Svrcina might have an advantage, winning 68% of such sets against Assche’s 58% over the last year.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Svrcina has a higher breakpoint conversion rate recently at 40.21%, while Assche’s rate is 36.36%.

Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent form and statistical insights, Assche shows superiority in second serve performance, crucial for maintaining baseline stability throughout the game. His edge in handling breakpoint situations also suggests enhanced pressure management which might prove decisive in tightly contested moments.

However, Svrcina’s overall winning percentage over the past year and stronger first serve return stats reflect potential counter-aggression that could challenge Assche, especially given the indoor hard court scenario where Svrcina has historically performed well.

Svrcina’s advantage in converting breakpoints and dominating deciding sets further tilts the scale slightly in his favor when faced with pressure. Despite Assche’s experience against tougher competition, Svrcina's comprehensive performance trends suggest he might have a slight edge.

Considering these factors, Svrcina appears to be the marginal favorite to win the upcoming match, although Assche’s resilience and pressure handling could make it a compelling contest.