J. Schlageter
To Win
TBD
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L W W LForm
W L W W W L W W L WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Blanch winning 2 and Schlageter winning 0. The last match between Blanch and Schlageter was at the M15 Villena, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Dali Blanch getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
M15 Villena(19-02-2025)
- / Q2 round
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
17 Mar 2025 / Final
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Dali Blanch
Player
Justin Schlageter
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
81%
(
22 of
27)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
34
Total Points Won
23
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predictions Analysis:
In recent months, the performance of Blanch and Schlageter in second serve points has been closely observed. Blanch has exhibited a commendable performance, winning 48.64% of points on their second serve, whereas Schlageter has captured 47.09% of these points. It is important to note that there is a significant correlation between this statistical factor and the accuracy of match predictions.
Another aspect worth considering is the return game statistics. Recent data reveals that Blanch has triumphed in 49.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schlageter has displayed exceptional performance, winning 50.91% of these points. Similarly, when it comes to first serve returns, Blanch has a success rate of 36.44%, and Schlageter follows closely with 33.56%. These return game statistics hold great significance in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
Exploring the player's ability to handle pressure, Blanch has effectively saved 55.88% of breakpoints in their recent matches. As for Schlageter, their statistics demonstrate a slightly higher resilience, with a saving rate of 59.13%. These saving percentages become essential tools for predicting bets during the course of a game.
An overview of the players' performances reveals valuable insights. In the past year, Blanch has experienced mixed results, winning only 43.4% of matches played (W/L 23/30). In contrast, Schlageter has showcased remarkable proficiency, securing victory in 68.75% of matches played (W/L 33/15). Reflecting on these numbers, it is evident that Schlageter holds a significant advantage in their overall head-to-head prediction overview.
Moving on to the consideration of playing surfaces, Blanch has established their dominance on clay courts, with a winning percentage of 51% (W/L 48/47). However, on indoor hard courts, they have struggled considerably, failing to secure a single victory (W/L 0/1). Conversely, Schlageter has thrived on hard courts, boasting an impressive win percentage of 80% (W/L 16/4). Unfortunately, their performance on indoor hard courts drops to a 47% win rate (W/L 7/8). These surface-related statistics play a crucial role in formulating predictions.
In terms of player level, Blanch's recent matches have mostly taken place in competitive Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize of $10K. Within this context, they have achieved a moderate success rate of 42.86% (W/L 18/24). On the other hand, Schlageter has competed in a similar circuit and excelled, prevailing in 68.75% of matches played (W/L 33/15). It is essential to consider these divergent levels of play when determining the favored player.
Examining the opponents faced by both players, Blanch has encountered adversaries with an average rank of 462.11 over the past year. In contrast, Schlageter has competed against opponents with a significantly lower average rank of 147.1. These opponent quality statistics provide valuable context for predicting match outcomes.
In the context of deciding set performance, valuable insights can be derived. Over the past 12 months, Blanch has emerged victorious in 35% of deciding sets, indicating their ability to overcome critical junctures. In comparison, Schlageter has exhibited superior resilience, winning an impressive 62% of deciding sets in all matches played on tour. These statistics become particularly relevant for live predictions and betting during a match.
While past player performance serves as a useful indicator for predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to assess current event statistics. These statistics provide insights into the players' current form. Furthermore, certain players may excel or struggle at specific events, thus necessitating consideration when determining the eventual outcome of the match. To explore the current event stats of Blanch and Schlageter, please refer to the section below (if they have participated in the current event).
A critical factor to consider is break point conversion. In recent matches, Blanch has effectively converted 44.74% of their break point opportunities, while Schlageter has demonstrated a conversion rate of 38.95%. These statistics hold particular value for in-game live betting tips, especially when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in models that predict tennis matches, an informative article offers valuable insights in this field. However, it is essential to note that the article caters specifically to statistics enthusiasts and researchers.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Dali Blanch
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
114)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
106
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dali Blanch
Player
Oscar Moraing
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dali Blanch
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Darwin Blanch
Player
Dali Blanch
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alejandro Manzanera Pertusa
Player
Dali Blanch
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve %
68%
(
17 of
25)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
27
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dali Blanch
Player
Lilian Marmousez
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dali Blanch
Player
Justin Schlageter
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
81%
(
22 of
27)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
34
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Dali Blanch
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dali Blanch
Player
Leonardo Rossi
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Branko Djuric
Player
Dali Blanch
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
38 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 1-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Justin Schlageter
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 3-6 7-5 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Justin Schlageter
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Justin Schlageter
Player
Yaroslav Demin
51%
(
49 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
3
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
See recent tennis photos of Blanch and Schlageter