Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dabin Kim vs Zoe Hives Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kim vs Hives analysis and find out who is favored!
Dabin Kim vs Zoe Hives Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 40.68% of points on his second serve, while Hives has won 54.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 53.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hives has won 57.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.74% and 30.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 43.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hives has saved 78.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 17/ 10), with Hives winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 207/ 156), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hives has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 12/ 7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 80/ 57).
- Player level: In the last year, Kim has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 9/ 6), where as Hives has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 3/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kim winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Kim winning 3 and Hives winning 3. The last match between Kim and Hives was at the Singapore, 06-06-2018, Second, Hard with Dabin Kim getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kim and Hives have played a deciding set 2 times, with Kim winning 1 times and Hives 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kim winning 0, and Hives 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of 180 while Hives has played against players with an average rank of 157.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hives has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 56.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hives has converted 53.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 1 Hives
689
Rank
318
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
891
Rank
140
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
57% (217-167)
Career Total W/L
60% (136-90)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
75% (3-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$307,080
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dabin Kim | Zoe Hives |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 21 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:0 | 1:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (41/65) | 64% (54/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 54% (22/41) | 50% (27/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (15/24) | 43% (13/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (7/15) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (44/84) | 43% (28/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 2-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Dabin Kim
Player
Zoe Hives
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-1 3-6 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dabin Kim | Zoe Hives |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 75% (3/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 78% (7/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (55/54) | 74% (46/16) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 256 | 157 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (188/268) | 55% (71/128) |
| 1st Serve W% | 51% (96/188) | 69% (49/71) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (34/80) | 54% (31/57) |
| BPs Won% Total | 58% (19/33) | 54% (7/13) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (137/273) | 41% (44/107) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Dabin Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Dabin Kim
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
73%
(
19 of
26)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
42%
(
11 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
32
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Dabin Kim
75%
(
78 of
104)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dabin Kim
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
79%
(
77 of
97)
1st Serve %
77%
(
77 of
100)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
56%
(
54 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
54 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dabin Kim
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hayu Kinoshita
Player
Dabin Kim
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
43%
(
29 of
67)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(7) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Irina Khromacheva
Player
Dabin Kim
40%
(
19 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Dabin Kim
Player
Yujin Ahn
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zoe Hives Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Zoe Hives
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zoe Hives
Player
Gloria Jovic
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Zoe Hives
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zoe Hives
Player
Harmony Tan
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Zoe Hives
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Zoe Hives
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Angelica Blake
Player
Zoe Hives
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ylona-Georgiana Ghioroaie
Player
Zoe Hives
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kim Vs Hives Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
