Cruz Hewitt vs Illya Marchenko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W W W L
Form
L L L L L L W W L LHead-to-head: Hewitt 1 - 0 Marchenko
They have played 0 sets in total, with Hewitt winning 0 and Marchenko winning 0. The last match between Hewitt and Marchenko was at the Brisbane 2 Challenger, 02-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Cruz Hewitt getting the victory 1-1 ret..
Brisbane 2 Challenger(02-02-2025)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-1 ret. |
Stats 
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Illya Marchenko
25%
(
2 of
8)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
7
Total Points Won
7
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
0
0
Sets Won
0
1
Games Won
1
1
Aces (Total)
0
1
Total Double Faults
0
0:11:28
Average Match Time
0:11:28
25% (2/8)
1st Serve %
83% (5/6)
50% (1/2)
1st Serve Win %
20% (1/5)
33% (2/6)
2nd Serve Win %
100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)
Break Points Won % (Total)
100% (1/1)
67% (4/6)
Return Points Win %
63% (5/8)
0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cruz Hewitt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Cruz Hewitt
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Sanhui Shin
49%
(
44 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(1) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Dane Sweeny
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Ethan Cook
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Cruz Hewitt
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Seongbin Sim
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 6-7(5) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Illya Marchenko
25%
(
2 of
8)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
7
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Illya Marchenko
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
6
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Joshua Charlton
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
94)
18
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
1
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
11
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Illya Marchenko
51%
(
60 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
14
Aces
11
14
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
46 of
56)
52%
(
30 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
93)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seongchan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Illya Marchenko
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
53% (18/16)
Win/Loss
57% (604/458)
47% (37/41)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (1422/1123)
49% (382/401)
Games Win/Loss
52% (12836/11887)
53% (18/16)
Hard Win/Loss
58% (253/182)
0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss
43% (63/85)
0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L
63% (253/150)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
46% (35/41)
0.18
Aces Per Game
0.33
68
Aces Total
4028
0.23
Double Faults Per Game
0.25
88
Total Double Faults
2969
1:10:16
Average Match Time
1:14:14
298.03
Average Opponent Rank
546.9
55% (936/1700)
1st Serve %
57% (34438/59903)
66% (614/936)
1st Serve Win %
72% (24897/34438)
51% (387/764)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (12818/25456)
45% (55/123)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (2330/5660)
37% (595/1620)
Return Points Win %
38% (23028/59962)
0% (0/1)
Slam W/L
51% (44/43)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
31% (11/25)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
57% (17/13)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
51% (106/103)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
38% (3/5)
Challenger W/L
60% (369/249)
60% (15/10)
Futures W/L
70% (57/24)
52% (17/33)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
57% (570/1002)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
49% (23/47)
31% (4/13)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (210/421)
75% (9/12)
Deciding Set Win %
47% (172/369)
87% (15/13)
1st Set Won, Won Match
83% (595/493)
13% (15/2)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
17% (595/102)
22% (18/4)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
24% (466/110)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
