Prediction of Cristina Bucsa [94th] vs Sophie Chang [252nd] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L W L W
Form
W W L L L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Bucsa 1 - 0 Chang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bucsa winning 2 and Chang winning 0. The last match between Bucsa and Chang was at the ATX Open - Austin, 23-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Cristina Bucsa getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cristina Bucsa | 1 |
| Sophie Chang | 0 |
| Bucsa | Stats | Chang |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (12-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 25% (3-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 94 | Ranking | 252 |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 217 |
| 27 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 4 |
| 59% (346-238) | Career Total W/L | 50% (270-274) |
| $1,597,967 | Career Prize Money | $45,925 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Sophie Chang
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:54:5 | Average Match Time | 0:54:5 |
| 73% (30/41) | 1st Serve % | 44% (19/43) |
| 83% (25/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (11/19) |
| 64% (7/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (21/43) | Return Points Win % | 22% (9/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cristina Bucsa vs Sophie Chang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bucsa 1 - 0 Chang
Editorial Prediction:
🎾 **Second Serve Savior Stats & Predictive Wizardry** 🎾
Roll up your sleeves, folks! It's time to dive into the tantalizing world of second serve statistics, where Bucsa has been putting in some wizard-like performances. Over the last six months, Bucsa has been winning 43.2% of points on their second serve, while Chang has been charming 37.89% of those elusive points. This magical number is as crucial as deciding whether to bring an umbrella on a cloudy day when it comes to predicting match outcomes. 🧙♂️
🤹♂️ **Return Game Shenanigans** 🤹♂️
In the land of return games, Bucsa has been stealing thunder faster than a kid in a candy store, winning 55.39% of their opponent's second serve points. Not to be outdone, Chang has managed to gobble up 55.82% of their rival’s second serves. When it comes to first serve returns, Bucsa swipes at 38.92%, while Chang notches up at 38.43%. These stats are basically the tarot cards for predicting who's going to have the last laugh in this head-to-head clash. 🎉
💪 **Pressure Cookers & Breakpoint Battles** 💪
Under the nail-biting pressure of breakpoints, Bucsa is like a pressure cooker that just keeps surviving, saving 55.98% of them recently. Chang, on the other hand, might need a sturdier kitchen appliance, having saved 45.45%. This is the stat that thrills those who love their in-game betting with extra spice. 🔥
🗺️ **Performance GPS: Past Journeys & Navigational Numbers** 🗺️
In the wilderness of past performances, Bucsa has wandered through 45.1% of victorious matches in the past year, while Chang trotted a tad further, boasting a 51.52% win rate. But wait, Bucsa’s best terrain seems to be **I.hard**, triumphing at 63%, whereas grass seems to be slipperier, winning only 52%. Chang dances best on clay with a conquest rate of 54%, but looks like Bambi on ice—oops, grass—with a meager win rate of 27%. 🌿
🧗♀️ **Level-Up Adventures: Tour & Tournament Escapades** 🧗♀️
When it comes to facing foes with elite powers, Bucsa has duked it out with opponents averaging a rank of 131.25, while Chang has been chilling in the lower ranks, averaging 373.41. It's all about experience levels folks—like comparing a grizzled knight to a sprightly squire. ⚔️
🔮 **Decisive Drama & Prediction Prowess** 🔮
Should the match head into a nail-biting deciding set, Bucsa has clinched 50% of these dramatic encounters over the last year. Meanwhile, Chang out-canastas Bucsa, emerging victorious in 56% of these cliffhangers—proof that Chang thrives under pressure like a plant enjoying unexpected rain. 🌦️
📈 **Event-Specific Sorcery & Current Magic** 📈
Past performances are the breadcrumbs to our predictive cake, but don't forget to tally up the stats from the current event! Some players are more enchanted at certain events, and this is your crystal ball moment to refine your prediction strategy. When it comes to breakpoint conversion—a golden ticket for live bettors—Bucsa converts 49.29% of their chances, while Chang takes a cool 45.83%. With these numbers, your predictions will be as sharp as a swordfish at a fencing contest. 🎣
Cristina Bucsa vs Sophie Chang Best Odds For The Match
Cristina Bucsa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Marie Bouzkova
116%
(
74 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Cristina Bucsa
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Leonie Kung
46%
(
37 of
81)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
9
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Cristina Bucsa
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
54%
(
40 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Cristina Bucsa
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Sara Errani
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
50%
(
14 of
28)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
23 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Cristina Bucsa
69%
(
82 of
119)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
113
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Bernarda Pera
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Sophie Chang
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sophie Chang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Sophie Chang
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Sophie Chang
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Sophie Chang
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Sophie Chang
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Osuigwe
Player
Sophie Chang
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Sophie Chang
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Sophie Chang
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Chukwumelije Clarke
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Bucsa vs Chang?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Bucsa Vs Chang is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (346/238) | Win/Loss | 50% (270/274) |
| 57% (759/567) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (627/614) |
| 53% (6399/5577) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5877/5717) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 530 | Aces Total | 1182 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.43 |
| 1561 | Total Double Faults | 2443 |
| 1:20:39 | Average Match Time | 1:14:49 |
| 408.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 492.15 |
| 65% (21700/33220) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16216/27635) |
| 60% (13030/21664) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (10342/16216) |
| 45% (5190/11551) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (4756/11419) |
| 49% (2225/4580) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1546/3227) |
| 48% (16173/34014) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12052/26625) |
| 59% (338/571) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (266/536) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (53/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (65/129) |
| 56% (95/171) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (70/161) |
| 88% (324/285) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (281/232) |
| 12% (324/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (281/47) |
| 23% (259/60) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (263/36) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
