Corinna Dentoni vs Deeksha MANJU Prasad Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Dentoni vs Prasad analysis and find out who is favored!
Corinna Dentoni vs Deeksha MANJU Prasad Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dentoni has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Prasad has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dentoni, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Prasad has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dentoni has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Prasad has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dentoni has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Prasad winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dentoni has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 242/ 179), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 23/ 32). Prasad has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Dentoni has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Prasad has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dentoni has played against opponents with an average rank of 365 while Prasad has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dentoni has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Prasad has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dentoni has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Prasad has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Dentoni 0 - 0 Prasad
9
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Corinna Dentoni | Deeksha MANJU Prasad |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Corinna Dentoni Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Federica Bilardo
Player
Corinna Dentoni
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gabriella Price
Player
Corinna Dentoni
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sohyun Park
Player
Corinna Dentoni
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
QF |
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Corinna Dentoni
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Corinna Dentoni
Player
Martha Matoula
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Corinna Dentoni
Player
Dalila Spiteri
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
115)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
11
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
47 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
115)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Corinna Dentoni
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gaelle Desperrier
Player
Corinna Dentoni
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Deeksha MANJU Prasad Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Corinna Dentoni
Player
Deeksha Manju Prasad
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
15 of
34)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jennifer Luikham
Player
Deeksha Manju Prasad
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Deeksha Manju Prasad
Player
Richa Dadasaheb Chougule
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Funa Kozaki
Player
Deeksha Manju Prasad
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 5-7 6-1 10-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Sathwika Sama
Player
Deeksha Manju Prasad
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lexie Stevens
Player
Deeksha Manju Prasad
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Deeksha Manju Prasad
Player
Roselida Asumwa
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
34%
(
15 of
44)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
15
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Dan Ni Wang
Player
Deeksha Manju Prasad
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 ret. | H2H |
view more