C. Denolly
To Win
T. Genier
To Win
Corentin Denolly vs Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L W L L
Form
L L L W W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Denolly 1 - 0 Kjaer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Denolly winning 2 and Kjaer winning 0. The last match between Denolly and Kjaer was at the Skopje Challenger, 20-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Corentin Denolly getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Corentin Denolly | 1 |
| Nicolai Budkov Kjaer | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Skopje Challenger(20-05-2025)
Corentin Denolly
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
7
6
6
1
| Denolly | Stats | Kjaer |
|---|---|---|
| 39% (11-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (17-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 297 | Ranking | 307 |
| 269 | Highest Rank | 287 |
| 28 | Age | 18 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 3 |
| 62% (413-249) | Career Total W/L | 61% (43-28) |
| $56,935 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Humbert VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Aliassime VS Djere PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-1 |
Stats 
Corentin Denolly
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:24:38 | Average Match Time | 2:24:38 |
| 68% (50/74) | 1st Serve % | 65% (58/89) |
| 64% (32/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (30/58) |
| 46% (11/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (11/31) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 23% (3/13) |
| 54% (48/89) | Return Points Win % | 42% (31/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Denolly vs Kjaer Match Preview :
- Recent second serve performances indicate Denolly has a slight advantage, winning 44.54% of points compared to Kjaer's 43.13%. Could this minor edge be influential in the match outcome?
- Regarding return games, Denolly outperforms Kjaer in second serve returns with 47.54% success versus 42.6%. However, Kjaer slightly edges out in first serve returns at 28.07% versus Denolly's 26.13%.
- Under pressure, Denolly demonstrates a marginally better breakpoint save rate, achieving 51.47% compared to Kjaer's 49.8%.
- The overall match performance in the past year favors Denolly, who boasts a 60.56% win rate, slightly higher than Kjaer's 58.33%.
- Surface preferences differ: Denolly excels on clay with a 66% win rate, whereas Kjaer is stronger on indoor hard courts, with a 68% win rate.
- Denolly has mainly competed in lower-level events but shows a high win rate of 79.41%, while Kjaer's experience at higher-level events comes with a 58.33% success rate.
- Opponent quality also favors Denolly, having faced slightly higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 314.11, compared to Kjaer's average opponent rank of 321.4.
- If the match progresses to a deciding set, Denolly shows superior results, winning 75% of such situations compared to Kjaer’s 56%.
- In terms of breakpoint conversion, Kjaer is more efficient, converting 35% of opportunities, whereas Denolly manages 31.65%.
Editorial Prediction (May 20, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance data and head-to-head statistics, Denolly presents a strong case with slightly better second serve success and return game proficiency. Despite playing at lower tournament levels, their win percentage stands impressively high.
Moreover, Denolly's ability to handle pressure and excel in deciding sets gives them an added advantage. Kjaer, while performing well in breakpoint conversion, might struggle if the match extends into a tightly contested scenario.
Given these factors and despite Kjaer’s strengths on indoor hard courts, Denolly’s overall consistent edge in crucial game aspects suggests they are more likely to emerge victoriously in this matchup.
Denolly vs Kjaer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Corentin Denolly
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Corentin Denolly
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Corentin Denolly
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Corentin Denolly
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Blaise Bicknell
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Massimo Giunta
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
102)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Calvin Hemery
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (413/249) | Win/Loss | 61% (43/28) |
| 60% (902/607) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (96/67) |
| 54% (7563/6502) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (817/721) |
| 56% (61/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) |
| 66% (294/153) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (24/15) |
| 55% (58/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 2006 | Aces Total | 188 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1906 | Total Double Faults | 156 |
| 1:26:50 | Average Match Time | 1:34:53 |
| 498.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 377.38 |
| 65% (26651/40986) | 1st Serve % | 62% (2710/4403) |
| 67% (17932/26651) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1803/2710) |
| 49% (6978/14336) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (880/1693) |
| 45% (2090/4639) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (213/463) |
| 43% (17687/41568) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1851/4406) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 60% (3/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 43% (53/69) | Challenger W/L | 54% (15/13) |
| 67% (355/175) | Futures W/L | 74% (26/9) |
| 63% (410/653) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (43/70) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (102/180) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (10/18) |
| 59% (114/192) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (12/22) |
| 90% (398/359) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (38/35) |
| 10% (398/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (38/3) |
| 20% (264/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (33/8) |
Denolly vs. Kjaer Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
