Connor Farren vs Nikala Scholtz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Farren vs Scholtz analysis and find out who is favored!
Connor Farren vs Nikala Scholtz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Farren has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Scholtz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Farren, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Scholtz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Farren has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Scholtz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Farren has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 4/ 5), with Scholtz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Farren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 191/ 191), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Scholtz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 213/ 104), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Farren has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 4/ 5), where as Scholtz has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Farren winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Farren winning 0 and Scholtz winning 2. The last match between Farren and Scholtz was at the South Africa F3 (Stellenbosch), 06-12-2018, Second, Hard with Nikala Scholtz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Farren and Scholtz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Farren winning 0 times and Scholtz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Farren winning 0, and Scholtz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Farren has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.11 while Scholtz has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Farren has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Scholtz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Farren has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Scholtz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Farren 0 - 1 Scholtz
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
894
Rank
685
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
320
High
33
Age
R
Plays
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
13
Minor
Form
48% (200-214)
Career Total W/L
65% (217-119)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$4,340
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Connor Farren | Nikala Scholtz |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 8 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 14 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:39:0 | 1:39:0 |
1st Serve % | 54% (43/79) | 69% (40/58) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (30/43) | 88% (35/40) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (18/36) | 44% (8/18) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
Return Points W% | 26% (15/58) | 39% (31/79) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Connor Farren | Nikala Scholtz |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Connor Farren Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Connor Farren
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Keegan Smith
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Connor Farren
Player
Alexander Kotzen
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Braden Shick
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jaimee Floyd Angele
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Rudy Quan
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
13
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Ivar Aramburu Contreras
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
A.j. Catanzariti
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Nikala Scholtz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Maciej Smola
Player
Nikala Scholtz
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Patrick Foley
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Toby Martin
Player
Nikala Scholtz
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
5
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 6-7(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Joshua Luck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
82%
(
54 of
66)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jean Thirouin
Player
Nikala Scholtz
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
1
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Emilio Gomez
Player
Nikala Scholtz
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Trevor Allen Johnson
Player
Nikala Scholtz
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Dusty H. Boyer
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more