Connor Farren vs Hao Wu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Farren vs Wu analysis and find out who is favored!
Connor Farren vs Hao Wu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Farren has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Wu has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Farren, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wu has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Farren has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wu has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Farren has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 4/ 5), with Wu winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Farren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 191/ 191), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Wu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 59/ 41), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 29/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Farren has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 4/ 5), where as Wu has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Farren winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Farren winning 0 and Wu winning 2. The last match between Farren and Wu was at the China F13 (Anning), 20-08-2018, First, Clay with Hao Wu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Farren and Wu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Farren winning 0 times and Wu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Farren winning 0, and Wu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Farren has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.11 while Wu has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Farren has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Farren has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wu has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Farren 0 - 1 Wu
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
894
Rank
685
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
48% (200-214)
Career Total W/L
59% (88-62)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Connor Farren | Hao Wu |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 7 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
1st Serve % | 77% (44/57) | 74% (54/73) |
1st Serve Win% | 59% (26/44) | 70% (38/54) |
2nd Serve Win% | 62% (8/13) | 53% (10/19) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/6) | 38% (3/8) |
Return Points W% | 34% (25/73) | 40% (23/57) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-2 |
Hao Wu
Player
Connor Farren
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Connor Farren | Hao Wu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Connor Farren Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Connor Farren
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Keegan Smith
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Connor Farren
Player
Alexander Kotzen
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Braden Shick
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jaimee Floyd Angele
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Rudy Quan
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
13
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Ivar Aramburu Contreras
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
A.j. Catanzariti
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Hao Wu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Toshihide Matsui
Player
Hao Wu
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
12
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chuhan Wang
Player
Hao Wu
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Hao Wu
Player
Shohei Chikami
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Hao Wu
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hao Wu
Player
Dusty H. Boyer
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(8) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hao Wu
Player
Linang Xiao
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Dusty H. Boyer
Player
Hao Wu
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hao Wu
Player
Chuhan Wang
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 0-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more