C. Smith
To Win
Y. Watanuki
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W W W L WForm
W W L L L L L L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Smith winning 2 and Safiullin winning 0. The last match between Smith and Safiullin was at the Phoenix Challenger, 13-03-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Colton Smith getting the victory 6-4 7-6(2).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Colton Smith | 1 |
Roman Safiullin | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Phoenix Challenger(13-03-2025)
Smith | Stats | Safiullin |
---|---|---|
72% (23-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (10-15) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
135 | Ranking | 75 |
135 | Highest Rank | 36 |
22 | Age | 27 |
- | Plays | R |
2 | Titles | 25 |
72% (62-24) | Career Total W/L | 64% (408-225) |
$79,150 | Career Prize Money | $2,069,715 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-6(2) |
![]() ![]()
Colton Smith
Player
Roman Safiullin
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:53:45 | Average Match Time | 1:53:45 |
63% (50/79) | 1st Serve % | 67% (54/81) |
68% (34/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (35/54) |
48% (14/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (10/27) |
36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
44% (36/81) | Return Points Win % | 39% (31/79) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When analyzing second serve performance over the past six months, Smith slightly leads with a 48.02% success rate while Safiullin closely trails at 47.85%. This particular statistic is highly correlated with match prediction accuracy, offering valuable insights into potential outcomes.
Regarding return game effectiveness, Smith has managed to win 43.75% of their opponent's second serve points in recent form. Conversely, Safiullin excels in this area, securing 49.76% of these points, emphasizing his edge in this particular matchup. Additionally, when examining first serve return stats, Smith has claimed 27.79% of points compared to Safiullin’s 22.84%, further influencing head-to-head predictions.
Under pressure, Smith demonstrates greater resilience by saving 57% of breakpoints faced, whereas Safiullin manages 52.88%. This stat is especially beneficial for those engaged in in-game betting predictions. Additionally, Smith's performance advantage is reflected in their overall match win rate over the last year, standing at 76.79% compared to Safiullin's 53.45% win percentage, providing a comprehensive view of head-to-head predictions.
Considering surface preferences, Smith's most successful career surface is indoor hard courts with a 75% win rate, followed closely by hard courts at 73%. Safiullin, however, prefers hard surfaces, winning 70% of his matches there, his lowest efficiency being on clay at 58%. Furthermore, the level at which players compete is significant, with Smith dominating in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, boasting an 84.62% win rate, while Safiullin competes primarily on the Main tour with a 33.33% success rate.
Examining opponent quality, Smith has faced opponents averaging a rank of 325.29, whereas Safiullin's average opposition rank is 101.81 over the past year, a stark difference influencing match dynamics. If the match progresses to a deciding set, Smith's superior performance is evident with an 80% win rate compared to Safiullin's 33% success rate in similar situations on tour.
Break point conversion rates further distinguish the players; Smith converts 28.95% of these opportunities, with Safiullin closely following at 28.13%. These metrics offer crucial insights for real-time betting strategies whenever a player faces a breakpoint. As the event unfolds and current form becomes clearer, such data can prove invaluable alongside historical performances and specific event tendencies.
Based on a blend of these statistics, Smith appears to have a slight advantage heading into the match due to his higher consistency in critical areas like deciding set performance, breakpoint resilience, and overall match win rates, positioning him as the likely winner in this encounter.
Smith vs Safiullin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Colton Smith
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Colton Smith
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Colton Smith
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Colton Smith
Player
James McCabe
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
69 of
122)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Colton Smith
Player
Marco Trungelliti
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
104
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
James Kent Trotter
Player
Colton Smith
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Colton Smith
Player
Yosuke Watanuki
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
7
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
24 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Colton Smith
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Roman Safiullin
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
12
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
49 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
33 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
30 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Roman Safiullin
Player
Alexandre Muller
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Justin Engel
Player
Roman Safiullin
66%
(
76 of
115)
1st Serve %
74%
(
87 of
117)
18
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
69 of
87)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
30 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
34 of
117)
119
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(4) 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Roman Safiullin
71%
(
84 of
119)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
26
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
67 of
84)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
48 of
57)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
31%
(
37 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
22 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(10) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Roman Safiullin
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
9
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
44 of
53)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
29 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Bublik
Player
Roman Safiullin
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Roman Safiullin
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Roman Safiullin
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
72% (62/24) | Win/Loss | 64% (408/225) |
64% (130/72) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (925/581) |
56% (1087/841) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7829/6556) |
72% (31/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 70% (231/100) |
67% (4/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (85/64) |
75% (18/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (78/49) |
69% (9/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (14/12) |
0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
359 | Aces Total | 2987 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
170 | Total Double Faults | 1816 |
1:33:41 | Average Match Time | 1:30:1 |
303.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.06 |
66% (3571/5431) | 1st Serve % | 64% (25996/40870) |
69% (2476/3571) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (18565/25996) |
55% (1023/1860) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7626/14874) |
43% (251/579) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1787/4205) |
41% (2346/5661) | Return Points Win % | 40% (16775/41942) |
50% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 54% (20/17) |
75% (3/1) | Masters W/L | 57% (25/19) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) |
80% (4/1) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (43/49) |
68% (27/13) | Challenger W/L | 58% (130/94) |
77% (27/8) | Futures W/L | 81% (185/43) |
71% (59/83) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (383/591) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 52% (15/29) |
36% (10/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (115/223) |
71% (24/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (113/212) |
92% (53/49) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (393/340) |
4% (53/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (393/50) |
31% (32/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (239/64) |