Colin Van Beem vs Henri Squire Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Beem vs Squire analysis and find out who is favored!
Colin Van Beem vs Henri Squire Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Beem has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Squire has won 48.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Beem, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Squire has won 46.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Beem has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Squire has saved 64.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Beem has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Squire winning 57.47% (W/L 50/ 37) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Squire has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 63/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Beem winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Beem winning 2 and Squire winning 1. The last match between Beem and Squire was at the M15 Bad Schussenried, 24-07-2019, Second, Clay with Colin Van Beem getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Beem and Squire have played a deciding set 0 times, with Beem winning 0 times and Squire 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Beem winning 0, and Squire 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Beem has played against opponents with an average rank of while Squire has played against players with an average rank of 241.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Beem has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Squire has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Beem has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Squire has converted 41.7% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Beem 1 - 0 Squire
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
537
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
237
Rank
237
High
23
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
56% (191-153)
Career Total W/L
57% (154-117)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
63% (20-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$11,880
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Colin Van Beem | Henri Squire |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 11 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:58:0 | 1:58:0 |
1st Serve % | 47% (34/72) | 54% (46/85) |
1st Serve Win% | 59% (20/34) | 65% (30/46) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (20/38) | 41% (16/39) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 44% (4/9) |
Return Points W% | 46% (39/85) | 44% (32/72) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-6 6-3 4-2 ret. |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Henri Squire
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
79
Total Points Won
78
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Colin Van Beem | Henri Squire |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (20/12) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (44/30) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (387/340) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (16/8) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.76 |
Aces Total | 0 | 271 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
DFs Total | 0 | 98 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:32:19 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 220.84 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (1458/2271) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (1103/1458) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (393/813) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (79/187) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (803/2201) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (16/11) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (18/30) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/15) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/12) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 84% (19/16) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 16% (19/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 23% (13/3) |
Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Henri Squire Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Henri Squire
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Luka Mikrut
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Nicod
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Carlos Taberner
Player
Henri Squire
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jakub Nicod
Player
Henri Squire
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
18
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Henri Squire
Player
Robin Bertrand
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
26
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
30%
(
32 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Henri Squire
Player
Clement Chidekh
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more