Coco Vandeweghe vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vandeweghe vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Coco Vandeweghe vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vandeweghe has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hibino has won 45.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vandeweghe, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 54.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vandeweghe has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 55.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vandeweghe has won 30% of matches played (W/L 3/ 7), with Hibino winning 57.53% (W/L 42/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vandeweghe has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 70/ 34), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 42/ 52). Hibino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 268/ 199), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 43/ 48).
- Player level: In the last year, Vandeweghe has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 40% of matches (W/L 2/ 3), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 16/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Vandeweghe winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Vandeweghe winning 3 and Hibino winning 4. The last match between Vandeweghe and Hibino was at the ASB Classic - Auckland, 31-12-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Nao Hibino getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vandeweghe and Hibino have played a deciding set 1 times, with Vandeweghe winning 0 times and Hibino 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Vandeweghe winning 0, and Hibino 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vandeweghe has played against opponents with an average rank of 346.7 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 208.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vandeweghe has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vandeweghe has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vandeweghe 1 - 2 Hibino
5
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
2
Main
0
Minor
695
Rank
9
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
76
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
3
Main
3
Minor
Form
52% (308-281)
Career Total W/L
56% (366-292)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$4,045,196
Career Prize Money
$1,225,315
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vandeweghe VS Hibino H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Coco Vandeweghe | Nao Hibino |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
Sets Won | 3 | 4 |
Games Won | 33 | 33 |
Aces (Total) | 27 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 18 | 12 |
Avg Match Time | 1:40:38 | 1:40:38 |
1st Serve % | 61% (134/219) | 68% (151/221) |
1st Serve Win% | 66% (88/134) | 55% (83/151) |
2nd Serve Win% | 41% (35/85) | 54% (38/70) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (13/23) | 63% (12/19) |
Return Points W% | 45% (100/221) | 44% (96/219) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Vandeweghe VS Hibino H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 7-6(9) 6-2 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
73%
(
72 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
5
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
7
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
7-6(5) 6-1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
6-2 6-3 |
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Nao Hibino
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Coco Vandeweghe | Nao Hibino |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (28/28) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (259/245) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
Aces Total | 0 | 42 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
DFs Total | 0 | 56 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:48:31 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 145.14 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1102/1653) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (694/1102) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (253/551) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (91/199) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (730/1679) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/22) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/12) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 70% (10/7) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 42% (12/5) |
Coco Vandeweghe Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Eva Lys
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
52)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Robin Montgomery
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
63)
9
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Carol Zhao
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Barbora Palicova
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Su Jeong Jang
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Carol Zhao
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Xinyu Wang
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lena Papadakis
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Francesca Jones
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
35%
(
17 of
49)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Magda Linette
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nao Hibino
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more