Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clement Tabur vs Markus Eriksson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tabur vs Eriksson analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Tabur vs Markus Eriksson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tabur has won 47.63% of points on his second serve, while Eriksson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tabur, in recent form, has won 54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Eriksson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.32% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tabur has saved 58.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eriksson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tabur has won 73.03% of matches played (W/L 65/ 24), with Eriksson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tabur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 29/ 34). Eriksson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 258/ 182), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 75/ 68).
- Player level: In the last year, Tabur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 84.75% of matches (W/L 50/ 9), where as Eriksson has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tabur winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Tabur winning 2 and Eriksson winning 2. The last match between Tabur and Eriksson was at the M25 Bourg-en-Bresse, 01-07-2021, Second, Clay with Clement Tabur getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tabur and Eriksson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tabur winning 0 times and Eriksson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Tabur winning 2, and Eriksson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tabur has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.69 while Eriksson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tabur has won 74% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eriksson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tabur has converted 39.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eriksson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tabur 1 - 1 Eriksson
203
Rank
202
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
277
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
61% (239-152)
Career Total W/L
57% (405-310)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$500
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Clement Tabur | Markus Eriksson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 19 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:30 | 1:42:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (84/129) | 71% (94/132) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (57/84) | 77% (72/94) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (24/45) | 53% (20/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (40/132) | 37% (48/129) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Clement Tabur
Player
Markus Eriksson
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Clement Tabur
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Tabur | Markus Eriksson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (22/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (219/201) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 58 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:17 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 267.05 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (848/1358) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (579/848) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (240/510) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (60/167) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (582/1381) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Clement Tabur
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Clement Tabur
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
15%
(
3 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Damien Wenger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
15
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Hernan Casanova
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Emilien Voisin
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Markus Eriksson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Ryan James Storrie
Player
Markus Eriksson
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Jonas Trinker
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Ioannis Stamoulos
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve %
61%
(
17 of
28)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
37
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
William Ma
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Markus Eriksson
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Markus Eriksson
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Markus Eriksson
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
53 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
25 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Mridha
Player
Markus Eriksson
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Markus Eriksson
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wojciech Marek
Player
Markus Eriksson
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tabur Vs Eriksson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
