K. Feldbausch
To Win
C. Tabur
To Win
Clement Tabur vs Li Tu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W W W L
Form
L L W L W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Tabur 1 - 0 Tu
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tabur winning 2 and Tu winning 1. The last match between Tabur and Tu was at the French Open - Paris, 20-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Clement Tabur getting the victory 3-6 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Clement Tabur | 1 |
| Li Tu | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(20-05-2025)
Clement Tabur
Li Tu
3
6
6
3
7
5
| Tabur | Stats | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| 76% (37-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (13-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 217 | Ranking | 169 |
| 202 | Highest Rank | 164 |
| 25 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 10 |
| 61% (292-189) | Career Total W/L | 61% (202-129) |
| $78,000 | Career Prize Money | $360,965 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Aliassime VS Djere PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Clement Tabur
Player
Li Tu
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:6:0 | Average Match Time | 2:6:0 |
| 71% (60/85) | 1st Serve % | 56% (57/101) |
| 80% (48/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (39/57) |
| 44% (11/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (22/44) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 40% (40/101) | Return Points Win % | 31% (26/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tabur vs Tu Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Tabur has a slight disadvantage, winning 43.5% of points on their second serve compared to Tu's 43.93% over the last six months.
- Return Game: Tu also leads in second serve return points, winning 46.45% compared to Tabur's 45.21%. However, Tabur excels in first serve returns with 30.45% versus Tu's 22.55%.
- Breakpoint Resilience: Under pressure, Tabur outperforms, saving 55.5% of breakpoints, while Tu saves 52.23%.
- Overall Matches: Over the last year, Tabur won 60% of matches played, slightly higher than Tu's 55.88% success rate.
- Preferred Surface: Both players favor hard courts, with Tabur having a 67% win rate and Tu a 64% on this surface. Neither player fares well on grass, with Tabur having no wins and Tu holding a 54% win rate.
- Match Level: Tu has had marginally greater success in Challengers/ITF ＞$10K tournaments, with a 54.55% win rate compared to Tabur’s 51.11%.
- Opponent Quality: Tu has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents on average, with their opponents ranking 209.68 compared to Tabur's 211.05.
- Deciding Set Performance: If the match goes to a deciding set, Tabur has the edge with a 53% win rate, while Tu stands at 50%.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Tabur has a stronger breakpoint conversion rate at 35.32%, in contrast to Tu's 31.97%.
Editorial Prediction (May 20, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the key statistics, several aspects of Tabur's game stand out, particularly his performance in first serve returns and breakpoint resilience. These suggest a robust capacity under pressure and an ability to capitalize on opponent weaknesses.
Although Tu holds a narrow lead in second serve performance and return game stats, Tabur’s superior breakpoint conversion and performance in deciding sets likely provide him with critical in-game advantages.
Considering their past performance on hard courts, where they both excel, combined with Tabur's overall consistency in match play and his capability to outperform in pivotal situations, Tabur is positioned as the likely favorite in this upcoming match.
Tabur vs Tu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
70)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Arthur Gea
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
1
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
5
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Clement Tabur
50%
(
54 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
56%
(
31 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
82%
(
72 of
88)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Daniel Evans
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Li Tu
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Li Tu
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Ethan Quinn
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
11
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
5
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Li Tu
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
12
Aces
7
12
Double Faults
4
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Li Tu
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Li Tu
65%
(
74 of
113)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Oliver Crawford
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
21
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
28 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (292/189) | Win/Loss | 61% (202/129) |
| 58% (640/458) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (448/309) |
| 53% (5495/4823) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3825/3336) |
| 67% (84/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (141/80) |
| 62% (176/107) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (25/20) |
| 44% (32/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (18/13) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (18/16) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 1085 | Aces Total | 1528 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1088 | Total Double Faults | 672 |
| 1:35:50 | Average Match Time | 1:20:29 |
| 440.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.21 |
| 61% (17722/29138) | 1st Serve % | 61% (11545/18882) |
| 67% (11887/17722) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (8390/11545) |
| 50% (5651/11415) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3827/7337) |
| 45% (1475/3300) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (787/1853) |
| 43% (12686/29745) | Return Points Win % | 39% (7632/19410) |
| 38% (3/5) | Slam W/L | 38% (6/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (15/12) |
| 51% (67/64) | Challenger W/L | 48% (63/68) |
| 65% (222/118) | Futures W/L | 76% (113/36) |
| 61% (288/475) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (202/327) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 56% (70/124) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (56/106) |
| 57% (80/140) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (49/89) |
| 90% (273/247) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (194/173) |
| 10% (273/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (194/20) |
| 22% (208/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (137/29) |
Tabur vs. Tu Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
