Prediction of Clement Tabur vs Leo Deflandre Head-to-Head, At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
1 - 0
59% (265-181)
Career Total W/L
43% (32-42)
71% (10-4)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Clement Tabur
Player
Leo Deflandre
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| stats | Clement Tabur | Leo Deflandre |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Total Double Faults | 1 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:48:8 | 0:48:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (19/27) | 43% (17/40) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (13/19) | 65% (11/17) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (5/8) | 35% (8/23) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points Win % | 53% (21/40) | 33% (9/27) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Filippo Romano
Player
Clement Tabur
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve %
56%
(
14 of
25)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
27
Total Points Won
21
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Rodrigo Alujas
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Leo Deflandre
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Clement Tabur
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Hugo Grenier
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Hiroki Moriya
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Oleg Prihodko
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
76 of
117)
6
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
117)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Clement Tabur
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Leo Deflandre Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Leo Deflandre
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lucas Marionneau
Player
Leo Deflandre
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Baudel
Player
Leo Deflandre
48%
(
33 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Leo Deflandre
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leo Deflandre
Player
Luc Fomba
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Deflandre
Player
Lukas Pokorny
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leo Deflandre
Player
Romeo Hadzimehmedovic
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-0 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Schoenhaus
Player
Leo Deflandre
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Tabur | Leo Deflandre |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 59% (265/181) | 43% (32/42) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (585/435) | 46% (78/92) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (5071/4502) | 49% (847/882) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (83/40) | 54% (20/17) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (150/100) | 33% (5/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (32/40) | 32% (7/15) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 996 | 156 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 | 0.08 |
| Total Double Faults | 1013 | 68 |
| Average Match Time | 1:34:23 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 444.3 | 226.09 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (16248/26736) | 66% (2011/3042) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (10906/16248) | 65% (1307/2011) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5161/10487) | 47% (486/1031) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1339/2984) | 43% (117/274) |
| Return Points Win % | 42% (11539/27192) | 40% (1180/2963) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (61/60) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (204/115) | 43% (32/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (261/441) | 43% (31/72) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (59/108) | 40% (6/15) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (74/133) | 38% (9/24) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (250/225) | 78% (37/29) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (250/25) | 19% (37/7) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (196/40) | 8% (37/3) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
