D. Evans
To Win
C. Tabur
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W W W WForm
W W L L W L W W L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Tabur winning 2 and Elias winning 1. The last match between Tabur and Elias was at the M25 Reus, 05-04-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Clement Tabur getting the victory 6-3 4-6 7-6(8).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Clement Tabur | 1 |
Gastao Elias | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Reus(05-04-2025)
Tabur | Stats | Elias |
---|---|---|
76% (32-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (20-13) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
311 | Ranking | 315 |
202 | Highest Rank | 57 |
25 | Age | 34 |
R | Plays | R |
11 | Titles | 17 |
61% (287-187) | Career Total W/L | 56% (575-459) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $414,541 |
2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
22 May 2025 / Q2 round
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 4-6 7-6(8) |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Gastao Elias
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
51%
(
61 of
119)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
119)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
17 | Games Won | 15 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
2:57:13 | Average Match Time | 2:57:13 |
64% (65/101) | 1st Serve % | 51% (61/119) |
63% (41/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (39/61) |
53% (19/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (30/58) |
42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (5/10) |
42% (50/119) | Return Points Win % | 41% (41/101) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Over the past year, a comparative analysis of the two players reveals some insightful statistics that can help predict the outcome of their upcoming match. Tabur has won 51.52% of matches played (W/L 34/32), while Elias boasts a slightly higher win percentage with 56.34% (W/L 40/31). A detailed look at the average ranking of their opponents shows that Tabur has faced players with an average rank of 216.95, whereas Elias's opponents have had an average rank of 249.3. This indicates the different competitive levels each player has encountered.
Analyzing their second serve performance over the last six months, Tabur has won 45.4% of points, compared to Elias's 43.13%. These serve-related metrics are often closely linked to predicting match outcomes. In return stats, Elias shows a stronger performance, having won 50.9% of opponent's second serve points, as opposed to Tabur’s 45.94%. For first serve returns, Elias maintains an edge by achieving 28.04%, with Tabur close behind at 26.44%.
In terms of converting breakpoints, recent data shows Elias has been more efficient, converting 38.08%, while Tabur has achieved a conversion rate of 30.95%. This figure is particularly useful for anticipating in-game strategies. Similar to breakpoint conversion, under pressure scenarios reflect that Tabur has saved 56.76% of breakpoints, which is higher than Elias's 48.77%.
Considering their performance on different surfaces, Tabur excels on hard courts with a career win percentage of 67% (W/L 84/41) but struggles on grass (0% win rate, W/L 0/1). Conversely, Elias's best performance is on clay surfaces, holding a 58% win rate (W/L 366/270), but also underperforms on grass, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/9). Both players primarily compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, where Tabur has achieved a win rate of 50% (W/L 26/26), and Elias 47.17% (W/L 25/28).
If the match goes into a deciding set, Elias shows a superior record, winning 58% of such sets over the past year, compared to Tabur's 38%. Based on these comparative statistics, Elias appears to have a slight edge in this upcoming match due to his better performance in return games, higher breakpoint conversion rate, and stronger deciding set record.
Tabur vs Elias Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Li Tu
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Lucas Gerch
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Richard Zusman
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Tim Handel
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Andrej Nedic
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Vladan Tadic
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andres Santamarta Roig
Player
Gastao Elias
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
13 of
17)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
48%
(
19 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
33
Total Points Won
44
|
1-6 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cristian Garin
Player
Gastao Elias
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Henrique Rocha
57%
(
64 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
74 of
130)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
130)
126
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(9) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Leandro Riedi
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
56
Total Points Won
50
|
3-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Gastao Elias
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Learner Tien
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Comesana
Player
Gastao Elias
69%
(
72 of
105)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
79)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Gastao Elias
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
51%
(
61 of
119)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
119)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (287/187) | Win/Loss | 56% (575/459) |
58% (630/452) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1314/1141) |
53% (5412/4752) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12018/11182) |
67% (84/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (171/132) |
62% (171/105) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (369/275) |
44% (32/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (32/43) |
0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) |
0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
1065 | Aces Total | 2977 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
1063 | Total Double Faults | 2302 |
1:35:34 | Average Match Time | 1:21:25 |
443.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 554.57 |
61% (17396/28600) | 1st Serve % | 54% (31371/58058) |
67% (11668/17396) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (22038/31371) |
49% (5545/11203) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (13313/26683) |
45% (1450/3245) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2631/6090) |
43% (12463/29221) | Return Points Win % | 41% (24034/59120) |
20% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 40% (19/28) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 8% (1/12) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 44% (7/9) |
0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (61/64) |
50% (64/63) | Challenger W/L | 56% (368/289) |
65% (222/118) | Futures W/L | 68% (118/56) |
60% (283/469) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (559/987) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 37% (11/30) |
57% (69/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (145/309) |
57% (79/139) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (221/372) |
90% (269/243) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (513/433) |
10% (269/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (513/78) |
21% (205/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (518/142) |