C. Moutet
To Win
C. Tabur
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W W WForm
W W L L L W W L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Tabur winning 2 and Martinez winning 0. The last match between Tabur and Martinez was at the M25 Reus, 04-04-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Clement Tabur getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Clement Tabur | 1 |
Alex Martinez | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Reus(04-04-2025)
Tabur | Stats | Martinez |
---|---|---|
77% (34-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (12-10) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
311 | Ranking | 520 |
202 | Highest Rank | 520 |
25 | Age | 24 |
R | Plays | - |
11 | Titles | 0 |
61% (289-187) | Career Total W/L | 60% (104-69) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
- / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Alex Martinez
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
35
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 1 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:17:16 | Average Match Time | 1:17:16 |
59% (20/34) | 1st Serve % | 67% (44/66) |
95% (19/20) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (20/44) |
50% (7/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (7/22) |
40% (6/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
59% (39/66) | Return Points Win % | 24% (8/34) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When analyzing recent second serve statistics, Martinez has claimed victory in 46% of points, closely followed by Tabur with 45.78%. This subtle advantage demonstrates Martinez's slight edge in serving resilience. Additionally, return game metrics emphasize Martinez's superior performance, winning 48.64% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Tabur's 45.86%. First serve return stats also favor Martinez at 30.81%, outstripping Tabur's 26.8%.
In terms of handling pressure, Tabur has a slight advantage, saving 56.56% of breakpoints faced, marginally surpassing Martinez's 55.48%. Nonetheless, past year's performance overview reflects Martinez's higher win percentage at 62.5% (W/L 25/15) compared to Tabur's 50.77% (W/L 33/32), hinting at Martinez's consistency and competitiveness.
Surface preference shows both players excel on Hard courts; Tabur exhibits a 67% win rate (W/L 84/41), while Martinez holds a 66% (W/L 43/22) mark. Conversely, their struggles are apparent on Grass and Clay for Tabur and Martinez respectively. Moreover, Martinez's experience mainly comes from Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 57.69% of his matches (W/L 15/11). In contrast, Tabur has navigated Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 50% win rate (W/L 26/26).
Analyzing the caliber of opponents, Martinez has faced competitors with an average rank of 430.43, while Tabur has competed against opponents hovering around 220.29. For those interested in dynamic in-game predictions, Martinez's ability to clinch 75% of deciding sets offers a significant prediction advantage over Tabur's 38% win rate in similar situations.
Break point conversion rates crucially influence match momentum and outcomes; Martinez's 44.09% conversion underlines a decisive trait compared to Tabur's 31.45%. Observing current event performance and recognizing event-specific player tendencies can refine predictions, with both surface proficiency and recent performances informing expected outcomes.
Taking these statistics into account, Martinez seems to have a slight edge in performance indicators, suggesting that he might emerge as the victor in the upcoming encounter against Tabur.
Tabur vs Martinez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
82%
(
72 of
88)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Daniel Evans
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Li Tu
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Lucas Gerch
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Richard Zusman
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Tim Handel
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jan Kumstat
Player
Alex Martinez
48%
(
38 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Alex Martinez
Player
Max Houkes
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Vit Kopriva
Player
Alex Martinez
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alex Martinez
Player
Mili Poljicak
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
76)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Alex Martinez
Player
Jiri Vesely
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
9
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
5
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Alex Martinez
88%
(
75 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Alex Martinez
55%
(
11 of
20)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
35
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Alex Martinez
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (289/187) | Win/Loss | 60% (104/69) |
58% (634/452) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (231/172) |
53% (5437/4765) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2009/1858) |
67% (84/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (43/22) |
62% (173/105) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (51/41) |
44% (32/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (10/6) |
0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
1072 | Aces Total | 410 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
1065 | Total Double Faults | 542 |
1:35:33 | Average Match Time | 1:18:13 |
442.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 344.87 |
61% (17477/28720) | 1st Serve % | 59% (5216/8907) |
67% (11723/17477) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3381/5216) |
50% (5568/11242) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1758/3691) |
45% (1460/3267) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (412/960) |
43% (12532/29360) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3674/8780) |
43% (3/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50% (64/63) | Challenger W/L | 68% (13/6) |
65% (222/118) | Futures W/L | 59% (91/63) |
61% (285/471) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (104/173) |
57% (69/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (26/47) |
57% (79/139) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (34/57) |
90% (271/245) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (95/83) |
10% (271/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (95/12) |
21% (205/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (78/21) |